Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps in Serbia
Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps was 57.76 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps in Serbia, 1995–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps in Serbia is 57.76 million current US$, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 91.3% on the previous year and up 88.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps in Serbia peaked at 531.41 million current US$ in 2002 and was at its lowest, 24.85 million current US$, in 2014.
Serbia ranks 43rd of 174 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps in Serbia, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 43.79 million current US$ | — |
| 1996 | 41.61 million current US$ | -5.0% |
| 1997 | 28.39 million current US$ | -31.8% |
| 1998 | 34.20 million current US$ | +20.5% |
| 1999 | 119.05 million current US$ | +248.1% |
| 2000 | 98.65 million current US$ | -17.1% |
| 2001 | 78.28 million current US$ | -20.6% |
| 2002 | 531.41 million current US$ | +578.9% |
| 2003 | 116.75 million current US$ | -78.0% |
| 2004 | 87.36 million current US$ | -25.2% |
| 2005 | 67.81 million current US$ | -22.4% |
| 2006 | 202.49 million current US$ | +198.6% |
| 2007 | 78.39 million current US$ | -61.3% |
| 2008 | 107.81 million current US$ | +37.5% |
| 2009 | 114.53 million current US$ | +6.2% |
| 2010 | 126.26 million current US$ | +10.2% |
| 2011 | 71.46 million current US$ | -43.4% |
| 2012 | 52.61 million current US$ | -26.4% |
| 2013 | 30.66 million current US$ | -41.7% |
| 2014 | 24.85 million current US$ | -18.9% |
| 2015 | 50.93 million current US$ | +104.9% |
| 2016 | 90.70 million current US$ | +78.1% |
| 2017 | 167.31 million current US$ | +84.5% |
| 2018 | 107.28 million current US$ | -35.9% |
| 2019 | 52.38 million current US$ | -51.2% |
| 2020 | 43.06 million current US$ | -17.8% |
| 2021 | 43.57 million current US$ | +1.2% |
| 2022 | 30.18 million current US$ | -30.7% |
| 2023 | 57.76 million current US$ | +91.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 53.41 million current US$ | 28.39 million current US$ | 119.05 million current US$ | 5 |
| 2000s | 148.35 million current US$ | 67.81 million current US$ | 531.41 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 77.44 million current US$ | 24.85 million current US$ | 167.31 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 43.64 million current US$ | 30.18 million current US$ | 57.76 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
More aid effectiveness data for Serbia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 10.83 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 343,039 current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 134,406 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 454.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 27.64 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 57.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 167.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.51 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 828,015 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -11.46 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps in Serbia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps in Serbia was 57.76 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 531.41 million current US$ in 2002.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 24.85 million current US$ in 2014.
- How does Serbia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps?
- Serbia ranks 43rd out of 174 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 88.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 29 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.