Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps in Singapore
Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps was -2.47 million current US$ in 1995. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps in Singapore, 1965–1995
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Singapore recorded -2.47 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps in 1995.
The figure is down 9.8% on the previous year and down 137.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps in Singapore peaked at 78.25 million current US$ in 1989 and was at its lowest, -2.92 million current US$, in 1992.
That places Singapore 168th out of 174 countries with data for 1995, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps in Singapore, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 60,000 current US$ | — |
| 1966 | 60,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 130,000 current US$ | +116.7% |
| 1968 | 600,000 current US$ | +361.5% |
| 1969 | 140,000 current US$ | -76.7% |
| 1970 | 1.34 million current US$ | +857.1% |
| 1971 | 1.90 million current US$ | +41.8% |
| 1972 | 1.55 million current US$ | -18.4% |
| 1973 | 1.11 million current US$ | -28.4% |
| 1974 | 2.25 million current US$ | +102.7% |
| 1975 | 1.02 million current US$ | -54.7% |
| 1976 | 1.42 million current US$ | +39.2% |
| 1977 | 1.62 million current US$ | +14.1% |
| 1978 | 1.79 million current US$ | +10.5% |
| 1979 | 3.19 million current US$ | +78.2% |
| 1980 | 4.58 million current US$ | +43.6% |
| 1981 | 5.04 million current US$ | +10.0% |
| 1982 | 6.97 million current US$ | +38.3% |
| 1983 | 4.55 million current US$ | -34.7% |
| 1984 | 4.46 million current US$ | -2.0% |
| 1985 | 6.56 million current US$ | +47.1% |
| 1986 | 5.41 million current US$ | -17.5% |
| 1987 | 4.48 million current US$ | -17.2% |
| 1988 | 3.64 million current US$ | -18.8% |
| 1989 | 78.25 million current US$ | +2049.7% |
| 1990 | 820,000 current US$ | -99.0% |
| 1991 | -780,000 current US$ | -195.1% |
| 1992 | -2.92 million current US$ | +274.4% |
| 1993 | -2.62 million current US$ | -10.3% |
| 1994 | -2.25 million current US$ | -14.1% |
| 1995 | -2.47 million current US$ | +9.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 198,000 current US$ | 60,000 current US$ | 600,000 current US$ | 5 |
| 1970s | 1.72 million current US$ | 1.02 million current US$ | 3.19 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 12.39 million current US$ | 3.64 million current US$ | 78.25 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | -1.70 million current US$ | -2.92 million current US$ | 820,000 current US$ | 6 |
Countries ranked near Singapore
More aid effectiveness data for Singapore
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 50,000 current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 20,000 current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 590,000 current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 1.87 million current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany -2.47 million current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.31 million current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom -1.25 million current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 13.53 million current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway 20,000 current US$ (1985)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total 50,000 current US$ (2004)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps in Singapore?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps in Singapore was -2.47 million current US$ in 1995, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps recorded in Singapore?
- The highest recorded value was 78.25 million current US$ in 1989.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps recorded in Singapore?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.92 million current US$ in 1992.
- How does Singapore rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps?
- Singapore ranks 168th out of 174 countries with data for 1995.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Singapore?
- Over the last ten years it is down 137.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Singapore data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 31 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.