Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per was 1.02 current US$ per person in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Costa Rica, 1963–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per person.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Costa Rica is 1.02 current US$ per person, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 168.8% on the previous year and down 32.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Costa Rica peaked at 7.9 current US$ per person in 1990 and was at its lowest, -1.45 current US$ per person, in 1997.
Costa Rica ranks 90th of 174 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | current US$ per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1963 | 0.0135 current US$ per person | — |
| 1964 | 0.013 current US$ per person | -3.4% |
| 1965 | 0.145 current US$ per person | +1012.1% |
| 1966 | 0.3907 current US$ per person | +169.4% |
| 1967 | 0.1835 current US$ per person | -53.0% |
| 1968 | 0.2817 current US$ per person | +53.5% |
| 1969 | 0.3968 current US$ per person | +40.9% |
| 1970 | 0.5438 current US$ per person | +37.0% |
| 1971 | 0.8525 current US$ per person | +56.8% |
| 1972 | 1.03 current US$ per person | +21.0% |
| 1973 | 1.32 current US$ per person | +27.7% |
| 1974 | 1.5 current US$ per person | +13.5% |
| 1975 | 1.49 current US$ per person | -0.3% |
| 1976 | 1.72 current US$ per person | +15.2% |
| 1977 | 1.91 current US$ per person | +11.1% |
| 1978 | 3.5 current US$ per person | +83.2% |
| 1979 | 2.91 current US$ per person | -16.9% |
| 1980 | 5.31 current US$ per person | +82.7% |
| 1981 | 6.59 current US$ per person | +24.2% |
| 1982 | 3.54 current US$ per person | -46.2% |
| 1983 | 2.22 current US$ per person | -37.3% |
| 1984 | 2.01 current US$ per person | -9.8% |
| 1985 | 2.49 current US$ per person | +24.4% |
| 1986 | 4.43 current US$ per person | +77.7% |
| 1987 | 3.84 current US$ per person | -13.3% |
| 1988 | 4.13 current US$ per person | +7.4% |
| 1989 | 4.35 current US$ per person | +5.4% |
| 1990 | 7.9 current US$ per person | +81.6% |
| 1991 | 4.29 current US$ per person | -45.7% |
| 1992 | 6.33 current US$ per person | +47.5% |
| 1993 | 3.86 current US$ per person | -39.0% |
| 1994 | 4.06 current US$ per person | +5.2% |
| 1995 | 0.379 current US$ per person | -90.7% |
| 1996 | 0.6134 current US$ per person | +61.8% |
| 1997 | -1.45 current US$ per person | -335.6% |
| 1998 | 0.3939 current US$ per person | -127.3% |
| 1999 | -0.5929 current US$ per person | -250.5% |
| 2000 | 0.353 current US$ per person | -159.5% |
| 2001 | 0.1646 current US$ per person | -53.4% |
| 2002 | 0.768 current US$ per person | +366.5% |
| 2003 | 2.08 current US$ per person | +171.2% |
| 2004 | 2.12 current US$ per person | +1.9% |
| 2005 | 1.26 current US$ per person | -40.7% |
| 2006 | 1.71 current US$ per person | +36.0% |
| 2007 | 0.7351 current US$ per person | -57.0% |
| 2008 | 6.68 current US$ per person | +809.0% |
| 2009 | 3.34 current US$ per person | -50.1% |
| 2010 | 4.81 current US$ per person | +44.2% |
| 2011 | 2.15 current US$ per person | -55.3% |
| 2012 | 2.37 current US$ per person | +10.4% |
| 2013 | 1.52 current US$ per person | -36.0% |
| 2014 | 1.24 current US$ per person | -18.2% |
| 2015 | 3.64 current US$ per person | +193.2% |
| 2016 | 5.04 current US$ per person | +38.6% |
| 2017 | 0.5529 current US$ per person | -89.0% |
| 2018 | 1.02 current US$ per person | +84.1% |
| 2019 | 0.8612 current US$ per person | -15.4% |
| 2020 | 1.28 current US$ per person | +49.0% |
| 2021 | 0.6171 current US$ per person | -51.9% |
| 2022 | 0.3804 current US$ per person | -38.4% |
| 2023 | 1.02 current US$ per person | +168.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2035 current US$ per person | 0.013 current US$ per person | 0.3968 current US$ per person | 7 |
| 1970s | 1.68 current US$ per person | 0.5438 current US$ per person | 3.5 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.89 current US$ per person | 2.01 current US$ per person | 6.59 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.58 current US$ per person | -1.45 current US$ per person | 7.9 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.92 current US$ per person | 0.1646 current US$ per person | 6.68 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.32 current US$ per person | 0.5529 current US$ per person | 5.04 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.8258 current US$ per person | 0.3804 current US$ per person | 1.28 current US$ per person | 4 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
More aid effectiveness data for Costa Rica
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 287,578 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 55,010 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 734,559 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 31,872 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 5.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 60.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 414,114 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 576,025 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -3.09 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Costa Rica?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Costa Rica was 1.02 current US$ per person in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 7.9 current US$ per person in 1990.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.45 current US$ per person in 1997.
- How does Costa Rica rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
- Costa Rica ranks 90th out of 174 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is down 32.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 61 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.