Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Barbados
Barbados: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per was 232.56 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Barbados, 1968–2010
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2010, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Barbados stood at 232.56 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 900.0% on the previous year and up 150.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Barbados peaked at 1,186 current US$ per square kilometre in 1987 and was at its lowest, 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1968.
That places Barbados 52nd out of 171 countries with data for 2010, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Barbados, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1968 | 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 46.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1971 | 139.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1972 | 255.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.3% |
| 1973 | 162.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 1974 | 209.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 1975 | 418.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1976 | 162.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.1% |
| 1977 | 46.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.4% |
| 1978 | 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1979 | 116.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +400.0% |
| 1980 | 69.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1981 | 46.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1982 | 69.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1984 | 232.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +233.3% |
| 1985 | 395.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.0% |
| 1986 | 116.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.6% |
| 1987 | 1,186 current US$ per square kilometre | +920.0% |
| 1988 | 627.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.1% |
| 1989 | 511.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 1990 | 837.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.6% |
| 1991 | 232.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.2% |
| 1992 | 348.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1993 | 162.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.3% |
| 1994 | 69.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.1% |
| 1995 | 69.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 69.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 116.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.7% |
| 1998 | 162.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1999 | 279.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.4% |
| 2000 | 93.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 2001 | 209.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +125.0% |
| 2002 | 93.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.6% |
| 2003 | 69.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 2004 | 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 2005 | 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 46.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 2008 | 46.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 2010 | 232.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +900.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
| 1970s | 158.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 418.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 361.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 46.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,186 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1990s | 234.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 69.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 837.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 69.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 209.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2010s | 232.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 232.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 232.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
Countries ranked near Barbados
- 49 Cameroon 239.1 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 50 Poland 237.95 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 51 Czechia 234.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 53 Burkina Faso 228.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 54 Somalia 224.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 55 Timor-Leste 223.58 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Barbados
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 10,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 20,000 current US$ (1997)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 640,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 12.35 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 100,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 30,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 80,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway -10,000 current US$ (2001)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total 14.80 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Barbados?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Barbados was 232.56 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Barbados?
- The highest recorded value was 1,186 current US$ per square kilometre in 1987.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Barbados?
- The lowest recorded value was 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre in 1968.
- How does Barbados rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
- Barbados ranks 52nd out of 171 countries with data for 2010.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per rising or falling in Barbados?
- Over the last ten years it is up 150.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Barbados data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 41 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.