Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Brunei Darussalam
Brunei Darussalam: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per was 5.69 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Brunei Darussalam, 1983–1995
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 1995, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Brunei Darussalam stood at 5.69 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 50.0% on the previous year and down 25.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Brunei Darussalam peaked at 17.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 1988 and was at its lowest, 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1983.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 143rd of 171 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Brunei Darussalam, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1983 | 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 9.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +400.0% |
| 1985 | 7.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1986 | 11.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1987 | 13.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1988 | 17.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 1989 | 7.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.6% |
| 1990 | 5.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1991 | 5.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 11.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1993 | 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 1994 | 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 5.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 9.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 1990s | 6.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
Countries ranked near Brunei Darussalam
- 140 Solomon Islands 8.03 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 141 Qatar 7.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 142 Russian Federation 6 current US$ per square kilometre
- 144 Kazakhstan 5.38 current US$ per square kilometre
- 145 United Arab Emirates 4.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 146 Papua New Guinea 4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Brunei Darussalam
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 160,000 current US$ (1994)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 70,000 current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 30,000 current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 70,000 current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 10,000 current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.05 million current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total 40,000 current US$ (2002)
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP 10,000 current US$ (1995)
- Net official development assistance and official aid received 4.29 million current US$ (1995)
- Net official development assistance and official aid received 850,000 constant 2023 US$ (2004)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Brunei Darussalam?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Brunei Darussalam was 5.69 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Brunei Darussalam?
- The highest recorded value was 17.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 1988.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Brunei Darussalam?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre in 1983.
- How does Brunei Darussalam rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 143rd out of 171 countries with data for 1995.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per rising or falling in Brunei Darussalam?
- Over the last ten years it is down 25.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brunei Darussalam data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.