Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Hungary
Hungary: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per was 255.75 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Hungary, 1990–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Hungary is 255.75 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2004.
That represents a change of up 3.8% on the previous year and down 5.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Hungary peaked at 738.85 current US$ per square kilometre in 1991 and was at its lowest, 62.76 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1990.
Hungary ranks 43rd of 171 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Hungary, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 62.76 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 738.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +1077.3% |
| 1992 | 250.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.1% |
| 1993 | 319.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.7% |
| 1994 | 269.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 1995 | 232.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 1996 | 442.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.6% |
| 1997 | 379.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 1998 | 200.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.3% |
| 1999 | 320.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.1% |
| 2000 | 267.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.6% |
| 2001 | 210.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 2002 | 127.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.2% |
| 2003 | 246.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.6% |
| 2004 | 255.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 321.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 62.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 738.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 221.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 127.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 267.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
Countries ranked near Hungary
- 40 South Korea 267.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Liberia 264.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 South Africa 259.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Slovakia 248.03 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Ethiopia 247.94 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 46 Montenegro 247.41 current US$ per square kilometre
More aid effectiveness data for Hungary
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 8.90 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 450,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 760,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 237.81 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 160,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.92 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 12.78 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 730,000 current US$ (2003)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 30,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.72 million current US$ (2004)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Hungary?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Hungary was 255.75 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Hungary?
- The highest recorded value was 738.85 current US$ per square kilometre in 1991.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Hungary?
- The lowest recorded value was 62.76 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990.
- How does Hungary rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
- Hungary ranks 43rd out of 171 countries with data for 2004.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per rising or falling in Hungary?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Hungary data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.