Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Middle income
Middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per was 99.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
99.4 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 30.8%
Rank
27th
of 45 groups
All-time high
143.69 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
All-time low
2.36 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1962
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Middle income is 99.4 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 30.8% on the previous year and up 47.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Middle income peaked at 143.69 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
That places Middle income 27th out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 3.86 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.9% |
| 1963 | 3.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.0% |
| 1964 | 3.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1965 | 4.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 1966 | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.0% |
| 1967 | 5.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.5% |
| 1968 | 5.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1969 | 5.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1970 | 5.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1971 | 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1972 | 7.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1973 | 9.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.2% |
| 1974 | 12.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.7% |
| 1975 | 14.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1976 | 12.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1977 | 12.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1978 | 18.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.9% |
| 1979 | 27.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.9% |
| 1980 | 27.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1981 | 26.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1982 | 25.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1983 | 23.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 1984 | 19.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.8% |
| 1985 | 22.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 1986 | 28.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.5% |
| 1987 | 33.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1988 | 36.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1989 | 35.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1990 | 51.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.4% |
| 1991 | 48.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1992 | 60.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.7% |
| 1993 | 49.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.2% |
| 1994 | 44.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 1995 | 52.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 1996 | 47.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 1997 | 39.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 1998 | 36.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1999 | 34.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 2000 | 27.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.2% |
| 2001 | 28.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2002 | 33.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 2003 | 37.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 2004 | 37.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2005 | 92.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +147.5% |
| 2006 | 79.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 2007 | 87.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2008 | 91.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2009 | 57.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.1% |
| 2010 | 57.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2011 | 71.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 2012 | 59.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 2013 | 67.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2014 | 91.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 2015 | 99.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2016 | 102.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2017 | 105.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2018 | 122.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.2% |
| 2019 | 103.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 2020 | 133.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.7% |
| 2021 | 112.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.5% |
| 2022 | 143.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.4% |
| 2023 | 99.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 12.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 27.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 46.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 60.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 57.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 92.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 88.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 57.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 122.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 122.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 99.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 143.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Middle income
- 24 Serbia 686.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Yemen 683.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Malawi 656.55 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Ghana 607.13 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Uganda 517.12 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Benin 491.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Sri Lanka 422.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 373.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 293.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.42 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 28.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 6.29 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.17 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.38 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 463.14 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 10.26 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Middle income was 99.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 143.69 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
- Middle income ranks 27th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per rising or falling in Middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 47.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.