Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) in Pre-demographic dividend
Pre-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) was 2.23 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) in Pre-demographic dividend, 1975–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$) in Pre-demographic dividend is 2.23 % change on previous year, measured in 2022.
The figure is down 76.0% on the previous year and up 118.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$) in Pre-demographic dividend peaked at 194.87 % change on previous year in 1978 and was at its lowest, -21.14 % change on previous year, in 2009.
Pre-demographic dividend ranks 24th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) in Pre-demographic dividend, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1975 | 120 % change on previous year | — |
| 1976 | 190.91 % change on previous year | +59.1% |
| 1977 | 21.88 % change on previous year | -88.5% |
| 1978 | 194.87 % change on previous year | +790.8% |
| 1979 | 53.91 % change on previous year | -72.3% |
| 1980 | 22.6 % change on previous year | -58.1% |
| 1981 | 45.62 % change on previous year | +101.9% |
| 1982 | 14.87 % change on previous year | -67.4% |
| 1983 | 27 % change on previous year | +81.5% |
| 1984 | -1.3 % change on previous year | -104.8% |
| 1985 | 50.33 % change on previous year | -3967.0% |
| 1986 | 28.51 % change on previous year | -43.4% |
| 1987 | 9.67 % change on previous year | -66.1% |
| 1988 | 1.04 % change on previous year | -89.3% |
| 1989 | -17.04 % change on previous year | -1743.0% |
| 1990 | 24.13 % change on previous year | -241.6% |
| 1991 | -1.4 % change on previous year | -105.8% |
| 1992 | 31.04 % change on previous year | -2323.9% |
| 1993 | 55.79 % change on previous year | +79.7% |
| 1994 | 15.6 % change on previous year | -72.0% |
| 1995 | 39.63 % change on previous year | +154.0% |
| 1996 | 24.82 % change on previous year | -37.4% |
| 1997 | 32.94 % change on previous year | +32.7% |
| 1998 | 2.31 % change on previous year | -93.0% |
| 1999 | 4.23 % change on previous year | +83.0% |
| 2000 | 18.12 % change on previous year | +328.5% |
| 2001 | 38.43 % change on previous year | +112.1% |
| 2002 | 54.86 % change on previous year | +42.7% |
| 2003 | 29.73 % change on previous year | -45.8% |
| 2004 | 14.26 % change on previous year | -52.0% |
| 2005 | 6.9 % change on previous year | -51.6% |
| 2006 | 30.45 % change on previous year | +341.2% |
| 2007 | 29.93 % change on previous year | -1.7% |
| 2008 | 11.93 % change on previous year | -60.1% |
| 2009 | -21.14 % change on previous year | -277.2% |
| 2010 | -8.54 % change on previous year | -59.6% |
| 2011 | 1.17 % change on previous year | -113.8% |
| 2012 | -12.16 % change on previous year | -1134.9% |
| 2013 | -1.75 % change on previous year | -85.6% |
| 2014 | -2.99 % change on previous year | +70.9% |
| 2015 | -17.98 % change on previous year | +502.0% |
| 2016 | -8.81 % change on previous year | -51.0% |
| 2017 | 2.67 % change on previous year | -130.3% |
| 2018 | 0.6894 % change on previous year | -74.2% |
| 2019 | -1.77 % change on previous year | -357.4% |
| 2020 | 0.1129 % change on previous year | -106.4% |
| 2021 | 9.29 % change on previous year | +8129.8% |
| 2022 | 2.23 % change on previous year | -76.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 116.31 % change on previous year | 21.88 % change on previous year | 194.87 % change on previous year | 5 |
| 1980s | 18.13 % change on previous year | -17.04 % change on previous year | 50.33 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 22.91 % change on previous year | -1.4 % change on previous year | 55.79 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 21.35 % change on previous year | -21.14 % change on previous year | 54.86 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -4.95 % change on previous year | -17.98 % change on previous year | 2.67 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.88 % change on previous year | 0.1129 % change on previous year | 9.29 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near Pre-demographic dividend
- 21 Lao People's Democratic Republic 59.72 % change on previous year compare
- 22 Jamaica 59.09 % change on previous year compare
- 23 Kosovo 58.3 % change on previous year compare
- 24 Botswana 50.64 % change on previous year compare
- 25 Cambodia 48.53 % change on previous year compare
- 26 Honduras 48.38 % change on previous year compare
- 27 Brazil 47.99 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Pre-demographic dividend
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 47.80 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 379.95 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.13 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.24 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 483.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.73 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.62 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.28 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 402.06 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.80 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$) in Pre-demographic dividend?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$) in Pre-demographic dividend was 2.23 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$) recorded in Pre-demographic dividend?
- The highest recorded value was 194.87 % change on previous year in 1978.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$) recorded in Pre-demographic dividend?
- The lowest recorded value was -21.14 % change on previous year in 2009.
- How does Pre-demographic dividend rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$)?
- Pre-demographic dividend ranks 24th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$) rising or falling in Pre-demographic dividend?
- Over the last ten years it is up 118.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Pre-demographic dividend data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 48 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.