Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps was 17.62 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), 1974–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) stood at 17.62 million current US$.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 7.7% on the previous year and up 52.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) peaked at 26.53 million current US$ in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$, in 1975.
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 30th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1974 | 10,000 current US$ | — |
| 1975 | 0 current US$ | -100.0% |
| 1976 | 50,000 current US$ | — |
| 1977 | 10,000 current US$ | -80.0% |
| 1978 | 90,000 current US$ | +800.0% |
| 1979 | 210,000 current US$ | +133.3% |
| 1980 | 60,000 current US$ | -71.4% |
| 1981 | 130,000 current US$ | +116.7% |
| 1982 | 100,000 current US$ | -23.1% |
| 1983 | 130,000 current US$ | +30.0% |
| 1984 | 60,000 current US$ | -53.8% |
| 1985 | 20,000 current US$ | -66.7% |
| 1986 | 200,000 current US$ | +900.0% |
| 1987 | 220,000 current US$ | +10.0% |
| 1988 | 60,000 current US$ | -72.7% |
| 1989 | 70,000 current US$ | +16.7% |
| 1990 | 220,000 current US$ | +214.3% |
| 1991 | 250,000 current US$ | +13.6% |
| 1992 | 330,000 current US$ | +32.0% |
| 1993 | 440,000 current US$ | +33.3% |
| 1994 | 1.01 million current US$ | +129.5% |
| 1995 | 2.43 million current US$ | +140.6% |
| 1996 | 2.78 million current US$ | +14.4% |
| 1997 | 3.39 million current US$ | +21.9% |
| 1998 | 3.09 million current US$ | -8.8% |
| 1999 | 5.41 million current US$ | +75.1% |
| 2000 | 5.53 million current US$ | +2.2% |
| 2001 | 6.87 million current US$ | +24.2% |
| 2002 | 8.82 million current US$ | +28.4% |
| 2003 | 11.19 million current US$ | +26.9% |
| 2004 | 14.13 million current US$ | +26.3% |
| 2005 | 14.03 million current US$ | -0.7% |
| 2006 | 19.37 million current US$ | +38.1% |
| 2007 | 26.53 million current US$ | +37.0% |
| 2008 | 25.63 million current US$ | -3.4% |
| 2009 | 23.35 million current US$ | -8.9% |
| 2010 | 20.92 million current US$ | -10.4% |
| 2011 | 17.10 million current US$ | -18.3% |
| 2012 | 13.35 million current US$ | -21.9% |
| 2013 | 11.59 million current US$ | -13.2% |
| 2014 | 12.09 million current US$ | +4.3% |
| 2015 | 9.41 million current US$ | -22.2% |
| 2016 | 11.33 million current US$ | +20.4% |
| 2017 | 9.85 million current US$ | -13.1% |
| 2018 | 9.87 million current US$ | +0.2% |
| 2019 | 12.60 million current US$ | +27.7% |
| 2020 | 13.06 million current US$ | +3.6% |
| 2021 | 16.09 million current US$ | +23.2% |
| 2022 | 16.36 million current US$ | +1.7% |
| 2023 | 17.62 million current US$ | +7.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 61,667 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 210,000 current US$ | 6 |
| 1980s | 105,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 220,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.94 million current US$ | 220,000 current US$ | 5.41 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 15.54 million current US$ | 5.53 million current US$ | 26.53 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 12.81 million current US$ | 9.41 million current US$ | 20.92 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 15.78 million current US$ | 13.06 million current US$ | 17.62 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- 27 Burkina Faso 3.62 million current US$ compare
- 28 Haiti 3.47 million current US$ compare
- 29 Myanmar 3.09 million current US$ compare
- 30 South Africa 3.04 million current US$ compare
- 31 Nigeria 3.00 million current US$ compare
- 32 Bangladesh 2.96 million current US$ compare
- 33 Jordan 2.90 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
All data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) was 17.62 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 26.53 million current US$ in 2007.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ in 1975.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps?
- Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 30th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 52.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 50 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) with 358 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) with 358 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.