Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)
Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps was 13.20 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries), 1974–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) stood at 13.20 million current US$.
The figure is up 10.7% on the previous year and up 18.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 26.51 million current US$ in 2007 and was at its lowest, 10,000 current US$, in 1974.
That places Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) 34th out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1974 | 10,000 current US$ | — |
| 1975 | 30,000 current US$ | +200.0% |
| 1976 | 50,000 current US$ | +66.7% |
| 1977 | 10,000 current US$ | -80.0% |
| 1978 | 90,000 current US$ | +800.0% |
| 1979 | 120,000 current US$ | +33.3% |
| 1980 | 60,000 current US$ | -50.0% |
| 1981 | 70,000 current US$ | +16.7% |
| 1982 | 70,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 80,000 current US$ | +14.3% |
| 1984 | 50,000 current US$ | -37.5% |
| 1985 | 20,000 current US$ | -60.0% |
| 1986 | 200,000 current US$ | +900.0% |
| 1987 | 210,000 current US$ | +5.0% |
| 1988 | 60,000 current US$ | -71.4% |
| 1989 | 70,000 current US$ | +16.7% |
| 1990 | 220,000 current US$ | +214.3% |
| 1991 | 250,000 current US$ | +13.6% |
| 1992 | 330,000 current US$ | +32.0% |
| 1993 | 440,000 current US$ | +33.3% |
| 1994 | 1.01 million current US$ | +129.5% |
| 1995 | 2.34 million current US$ | +131.7% |
| 1996 | 2.76 million current US$ | +17.9% |
| 1997 | 3.38 million current US$ | +22.5% |
| 1998 | 3.08 million current US$ | -8.9% |
| 1999 | 5.38 million current US$ | +74.7% |
| 2000 | 5.51 million current US$ | +2.4% |
| 2001 | 5.67 million current US$ | +2.9% |
| 2002 | 8.82 million current US$ | +55.6% |
| 2003 | 11.19 million current US$ | +26.9% |
| 2004 | 14.13 million current US$ | +26.3% |
| 2005 | 13.96 million current US$ | -1.2% |
| 2006 | 19.37 million current US$ | +38.8% |
| 2007 | 26.51 million current US$ | +36.9% |
| 2008 | 25.48 million current US$ | -3.9% |
| 2009 | 17.99 million current US$ | -29.4% |
| 2010 | 18.29 million current US$ | +1.7% |
| 2011 | 16.02 million current US$ | -12.4% |
| 2012 | 11.14 million current US$ | -30.5% |
| 2013 | 9.83 million current US$ | -11.8% |
| 2014 | 10.30 million current US$ | +4.8% |
| 2015 | 7.91 million current US$ | -23.2% |
| 2016 | 9.72 million current US$ | +22.9% |
| 2017 | 9.44 million current US$ | -2.9% |
| 2018 | 9.38 million current US$ | -0.6% |
| 2019 | 12.11 million current US$ | +29.1% |
| 2020 | 12.55 million current US$ | +3.6% |
| 2021 | 11.92 million current US$ | -5.0% |
| 2022 | 13.20 million current US$ | +10.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 51,667 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 120,000 current US$ | 6 |
| 1980s | 89,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 210,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.92 million current US$ | 220,000 current US$ | 5.38 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 14.86 million current US$ | 5.51 million current US$ | 26.51 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 11.41 million current US$ | 7.91 million current US$ | 18.29 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 12.56 million current US$ | 11.92 million current US$ | 13.20 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 31 Nigeria 3.00 million current US$ compare
- 32 Bangladesh 2.96 million current US$ compare
- 33 Jordan 2.90 million current US$ compare
- 34 Burundi 2.53 million current US$ compare
- 35 Chad 2.53 million current US$ compare
- 36 Honduras 2.45 million current US$ compare
- 37 Rwanda 2.44 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 21.24 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 26.34 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 310.25 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 531.58 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 151.78 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.34 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 728.65 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 108.73 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 129.49 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 643.12 million current US$ (2022)
All data for Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) was 13.20 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps recorded in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 26.51 million current US$ in 2007.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps recorded in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was 10,000 current US$ in 1974.
- How does Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps?
- Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 34th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 18.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 49 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) with 358 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) with 358 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.