Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in China
China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per was 0.0038 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in China, 1982–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
China recorded 0.0038 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in 2023.
That represents a change of down 35.5% on the previous year and down 41.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in China peaked at 0.1949 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.0009 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2016.
China ranks 126th of 128 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in China, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1982 | 0.0021 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0.0032 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0032 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0064 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1986 | 0.0107 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.7% |
| 1987 | 0.0085 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1988 | 0.0011 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.5% |
| 1989 | 0.0011 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.0011 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0043 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0032 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0096 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1995 | 0.0234 current US$ per square kilometre | +144.4% |
| 1996 | 0.0426 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.8% |
| 1997 | 0.0394 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0565 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.2% |
| 1999 | 0.0639 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 2000 | 0.0426 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 2001 | 0.0415 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2002 | 0.0596 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.6% |
| 2003 | 0.0298 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0543 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.1% |
| 2005 | 0.0746 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.3% |
| 2006 | 0.0841 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2007 | 0.0554 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.2% |
| 2008 | 0.1949 current US$ per square kilometre | +251.9% |
| 2009 | 0.0128 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.4% |
| 2010 | 0.017 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 2011 | 0.0053 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.8% |
| 2012 | 0.0075 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 2013 | 0.0064 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 2014 | 0.0021 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 2016 | 0.0009 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.5% |
| 2017 | 0.001 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2018 | 0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre | +286.1% |
| 2019 | 0.004 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2020 | 0.004 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2021 | 0.0055 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.4% |
| 2022 | 0.0058 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2023 | 0.0038 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0045 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0011 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0107 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1990s | 0.0271 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0011 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0639 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2000s | 0.065 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0128 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1949 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0053 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0009 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.017 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2020s | 0.0048 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0038 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0058 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near China
- 123 Timor-Leste 0.0095 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 124 Cuba 0.0094 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 125 Iran, Islamic Republic of 0.0077 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 127 Kazakhstan 0.0018 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 128 Guyana 0.0005 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for China
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 8.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 100,022 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada -11.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 216.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France -48.60 million current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -8.89 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -521.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in China?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in China was 0.0038 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1949 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0009 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016.
- How does China rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
- China ranks 126th out of 128 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is down 41.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 40 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.