Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per was 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), 1990–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) recorded 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in 2022. That is the highest value across all 33 years on record.
The figure is up 1,264.0% on the previous year and up 10,023.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0.0026 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1992.
That places Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) 25th out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0.6929 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 0.194 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0026 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.6% |
| 1993 | 0.0048 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.4% |
| 1994 | 0.0192 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.1% |
| 1995 | 0.0765 current US$ per square kilometre | +297.8% |
| 1996 | 0.3366 current US$ per square kilometre | +340.0% |
| 1997 | 0.1499 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0179 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.0% |
| 1999 | 0.0782 current US$ per square kilometre | +336.5% |
| 2000 | 0.1861 current US$ per square kilometre | +138.0% |
| 2001 | 0.1516 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 2002 | 0.2145 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.5% |
| 2003 | 0.1721 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.8% |
| 2004 | 0.1848 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2005 | 0.1988 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2006 | 0.2732 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.4% |
| 2007 | 0.298 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2008 | 0.3159 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2009 | 0.1714 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.7% |
| 2010 | 0.0557 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.5% |
| 2011 | 0.0579 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2012 | 0.0278 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.9% |
| 2013 | 0.0792 current US$ per square kilometre | +184.4% |
| 2014 | 0.0383 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.6% |
| 2015 | 0.0613 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.2% |
| 2016 | 0.3062 current US$ per square kilometre | +399.3% |
| 2017 | 0.6564 current US$ per square kilometre | +114.3% |
| 2018 | 0.341 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.0% |
| 2019 | 0.2941 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 2020 | 0.2867 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2021 | 0.2067 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 2022 | 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +1264.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1573 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0026 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6929 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.2166 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1516 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3159 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1918 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0278 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6564 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2067 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 22 Bangladesh 22.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Honduras 21.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Guatemala 21.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Viet Nam 18.41 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 South Sudan 17.91 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Solomon Islands 17.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Somalia 16.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 227.32 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 75.39 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.22 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 12.13 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 452.60 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.56 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.39 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 495.74 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 437.73 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.13 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) was 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0026 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- How does Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
- Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 25th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10,023.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 33 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.