Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Rwanda
Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per was 98.85 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Rwanda, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Rwanda is 98.85 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 14.8% on the previous year and down 26.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Rwanda peaked at 255.78 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0.4054 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1993.
Rwanda ranks 8th of 128 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Rwanda, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 4.46 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 4.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 3.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.2% |
| 1983 | 8.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +122.2% |
| 1984 | 2.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.0% |
| 1985 | 27.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +857.1% |
| 1986 | 8.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.2% |
| 1987 | 8.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1988 | 7.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 1989 | 5.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 1990 | 3.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.5% |
| 1991 | 2.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 1992 | 2.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1993 | 0.4054 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.7% |
| 1994 | 163.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +40300.0% |
| 1995 | 255.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.2% |
| 1996 | 221.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 1997 | 162.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.7% |
| 1998 | 137.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 1999 | 100.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.1% |
| 2000 | 72.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.8% |
| 2001 | 42.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.3% |
| 2002 | 56.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.4% |
| 2003 | 79.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.3% |
| 2004 | 117.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.2% |
| 2005 | 106.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 2006 | 151.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.2% |
| 2007 | 140.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2008 | 134.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2009 | 82.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.7% |
| 2010 | 97.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 2011 | 92.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 2012 | 143.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.1% |
| 2013 | 133.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 2014 | 126.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 2015 | 96.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.3% |
| 2016 | 83.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 2017 | 94.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 2018 | 103 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 2019 | 86.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 2020 | 87.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2021 | 95.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2022 | 116.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 2023 | 98.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 8.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 104.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4054 current US$ per square kilometre | 255.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 98.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 42.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 151.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 105.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 83.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 143.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 99.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 87.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 116.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Rwanda
- 5 Sierra Leone 269.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Haiti 125.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Uganda 109.78 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Burundi 98.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Saint Lucia 81.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Liberia 79.13 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Rwanda
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 329,220 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 38.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 56.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 10.29 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 77.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 83.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 22.70 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 3.03 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 22.16 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Rwanda?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Rwanda was 98.85 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per recorded in Rwanda?
- The highest recorded value was 255.78 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per recorded in Rwanda?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4054 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993.
- How does Rwanda rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
- Rwanda ranks 8th out of 128 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per rising or falling in Rwanda?
- Over the last ten years it is down 26.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Rwanda data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.