Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Tajikistan
Tajikistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per was 0.077 current US$ per square kilometre in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Tajikistan, 1995–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Tajikistan is 0.077 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2019.
The figure is down 94.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Tajikistan peaked at 6.5 current US$ per square kilometre in 2001 and was at its lowest, 0.0714 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1995.
That places Tajikistan 106th out of 128 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Tajikistan, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 0.0714 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1996 | 3.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +4800.0% |
| 1997 | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.0% |
| 1998 | 0.1429 current US$ per square kilometre | -92.0% |
| 1999 | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +650.0% |
| 2000 | 2.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +93.3% |
| 2001 | 6.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +213.8% |
| 2002 | 2 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.2% |
| 2006 | 0.7145 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.3% |
| 2008 | 3.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +380.0% |
| 2009 | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.5% |
| 2010 | 0.1429 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.9% |
| 2012 | 0.2858 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 2019 | 0.077 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0714 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 2000s | 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7145 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 2010s | 0.1686 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.077 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2858 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Tajikistan
- 103 Hungary 0.1116 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 104 Tunisia 0.0932 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 105 Congo 0.0832 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 107 Kyrgyzstan 0.0681 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 108 Uzbekistan 0.0613 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 109 Mexico 0.0581 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Tajikistan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 190,855 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 320,000 current US$ (2009)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 108,440 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 65.15 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 24.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 26.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 898,301 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 430,843 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 72,820 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 24.64 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Tajikistan?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Tajikistan was 0.077 current US$ per square kilometre in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per recorded in Tajikistan?
- The highest recorded value was 6.5 current US$ per square kilometre in 2001.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per recorded in Tajikistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0714 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995.
- How does Tajikistan rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
- Tajikistan ranks 106th out of 128 countries with data for 2019.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per rising or falling in Tajikistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 94.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tajikistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.