Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per was 29.77 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Zimbabwe, 1981–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Zimbabwe recorded 29.77 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is down 3.6% on the previous year and up 34.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Zimbabwe peaked at 39.42 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.1292 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1981.
Zimbabwe ranks 21st of 128 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1981 | 0.1292 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0.7496 current US$ per square kilometre | +480.0% |
| 1983 | 0.6204 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 1984 | 0.6462 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1985 | 0.9047 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1986 | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.7% |
| 1987 | 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.8% |
| 1988 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.7% |
| 1989 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 1990 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1991 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.6% |
| 1992 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.0% |
| 1993 | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1994 | 2.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1995 | 5.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +163.1% |
| 1996 | 5.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1997 | 6.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.1% |
| 1998 | 6.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1999 | 4.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.5% |
| 2000 | 4.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 2001 | 2.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.7% |
| 2002 | 8.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +185.1% |
| 2003 | 11.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.4% |
| 2004 | 14.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 2005 | 13.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 2006 | 27.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +107.2% |
| 2007 | 34.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.7% |
| 2008 | 39.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 2009 | 22.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.7% |
| 2010 | 16.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.1% |
| 2011 | 26 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.6% |
| 2012 | 20.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 2013 | 22.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2014 | 22.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2015 | 18.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 2016 | 18.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2017 | 19.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2018 | 22.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 2019 | 21.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2020 | 25.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 2021 | 27.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2022 | 30.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 2023 | 29.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1292 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1990s | 3.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 17.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 20.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 26 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 28.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 18 Jordan 32.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Tanzania, United Republic of 30.41 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Gambia 30.17 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Bangladesh 22.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Honduras 21.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Guatemala 21.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Zimbabwe
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 75,834 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 331,066 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 7.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 35.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 9.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 17.35 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 6.26 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 36.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 575,259 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 12.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Zimbabwe?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Zimbabwe was 29.77 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 39.42 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1292 current US$ per square kilometre in 1981.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
- Zimbabwe ranks 21st out of 128 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 34.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 43 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.