Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Central Europe and the Baltics
Central Europe and the Baltics: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2004. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Central Europe and the Baltics, 1990–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Central Europe and the Baltics is 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, measured in 2004.
The figure is up 95.5% on the previous year and down 36.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Central Europe and the Baltics peaked at 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, in 1998.
That places Central Europe and the Baltics 37th out of 46 groups with data for 2004, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per in Central Europe and the Baltics, year by year
| Year | current US$ per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1992 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -93.9% |
| 1993 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +75.1% |
| 1994 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +184.1% |
| 1995 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 1996 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +4.0% |
| 1997 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 1998 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -98.2% |
| 1999 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +211.6% |
| 2000 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +1622.3% |
| 2001 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -73.1% |
| 2002 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +142.8% |
| 2003 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -43.1% |
| 2004 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +95.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Central Europe and the Baltics
- 34 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 35 Nicaragua 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 36 Kenya 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 37 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 38 Honduras 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 39 Jordan 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 40 Myanmar 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
More aid effectiveness data for Central Europe and the Baltics
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.74 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 110,000 current US$ (2009)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 105.39 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.53 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.77 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.05 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 280,000 current US$ (2011)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.88 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per in Central Europe and the Baltics was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The highest recorded value was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1990.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1998.
- How does Central Europe and the Baltics rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 37th out of 46 groups with data for 2004.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per rising or falling in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Over the last ten years it is down 36.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Central Europe and the Baltics data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.