Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland was 16.85 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), 1974–2023
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) stood at 16.85 million current US$.
The figure is up 51.8% on the previous year and down 34.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) peaked at 57.72 million current US$ in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$, in 1974.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 32nd of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1974 | 0 current US$ | — |
| 1975 | 0 current US$ | — |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ | — |
| 1977 | 10,000 current US$ | — |
| 1978 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 50,000 current US$ | +400.0% |
| 1980 | 30,000 current US$ | -40.0% |
| 1981 | 60,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1982 | 70,000 current US$ | +16.7% |
| 1983 | 250,000 current US$ | +257.1% |
| 1984 | 120,000 current US$ | -52.0% |
| 1985 | 150,000 current US$ | +25.0% |
| 1986 | 170,000 current US$ | +13.3% |
| 1987 | 320,000 current US$ | +88.2% |
| 1988 | 70,000 current US$ | -78.1% |
| 1989 | 30,000 current US$ | -57.1% |
| 1990 | 120,000 current US$ | +300.0% |
| 1991 | 240,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1992 | 1.02 million current US$ | +325.0% |
| 1993 | 840,000 current US$ | -17.6% |
| 1994 | 2.39 million current US$ | +184.5% |
| 1995 | 3.16 million current US$ | +32.2% |
| 1996 | 2.87 million current US$ | -9.2% |
| 1997 | 3.57 million current US$ | +24.4% |
| 1998 | 2.19 million current US$ | -38.7% |
| 1999 | 4.11 million current US$ | +87.7% |
| 2000 | 4.51 million current US$ | +9.7% |
| 2001 | 4.09 million current US$ | -9.3% |
| 2002 | 5.68 million current US$ | +38.9% |
| 2003 | 7.06 million current US$ | +24.3% |
| 2004 | 9.92 million current US$ | +40.5% |
| 2005 | 23.96 million current US$ | +141.5% |
| 2006 | 30.49 million current US$ | +27.3% |
| 2007 | 45.71 million current US$ | +49.9% |
| 2008 | 57.72 million current US$ | +26.3% |
| 2009 | 40.91 million current US$ | -29.1% |
| 2010 | 30.58 million current US$ | -25.3% |
| 2011 | 28.37 million current US$ | -7.2% |
| 2012 | 28.27 million current US$ | -0.4% |
| 2013 | 25.87 million current US$ | -8.5% |
| 2014 | 25.95 million current US$ | +0.3% |
| 2015 | 16.57 million current US$ | -36.1% |
| 2016 | 15.45 million current US$ | -6.8% |
| 2017 | 14.88 million current US$ | -3.7% |
| 2018 | 16.68 million current US$ | +12.1% |
| 2019 | 19.79 million current US$ | +18.6% |
| 2020 | 16.70 million current US$ | -15.6% |
| 2021 | 16.40 million current US$ | -1.8% |
| 2022 | 11.10 million current US$ | -32.3% |
| 2023 | 16.85 million current US$ | +51.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 11,667 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 50,000 current US$ | 6 |
| 1980s | 127,000 current US$ | 30,000 current US$ | 320,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.05 million current US$ | 120,000 current US$ | 4.11 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 23.00 million current US$ | 4.09 million current US$ | 57.72 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 22.24 million current US$ | 14.88 million current US$ | 30.58 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 15.26 million current US$ | 11.10 million current US$ | 16.85 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- 29 Myanmar 3.09 million current US$ compare
- 30 South Africa 3.04 million current US$ compare
- 31 Nigeria 3.00 million current US$ compare
- 32 Bangladesh 2.96 million current US$ compare
- 33 Jordan 2.90 million current US$ compare
- 34 Burundi 2.53 million current US$ compare
- 35 Chad 2.53 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) was 16.85 million current US$ in 2023, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 57.72 million current US$ in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ in 1974.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 32nd out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 34.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 50 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.