Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), annual in Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), annual was -75.8 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), annual in Sri Lanka, 1968–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Sri Lanka recorded -75.8 % change on previous year for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), annual in 2023.
The figure is down 3,572.3% on the previous year and down 430.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), annual in Sri Lanka peaked at 750 % change on previous year in 2001 and was at its lowest, -277.78 % change on previous year, in 1982.
Sri Lanka ranks 113th of 140 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), annual in Sri Lanka, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1968 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1969 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1971 | -103.49 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | -128.57 % change on previous year | +24.2% |
| 1973 | 3.12 % change on previous year | -102.4% |
| 1974 | 12.9 % change on previous year | +312.9% |
| 1975 | 514.82 % change on previous year | +3889.8% |
| 1976 | -117.86 % change on previous year | -122.9% |
| 1977 | 495 % change on previous year | -520.0% |
| 1978 | -110.13 % change on previous year | -122.2% |
| 1979 | 200 % change on previous year | -281.6% |
| 1980 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1981 | 125 % change on previous year | — |
| 1982 | -277.78 % change on previous year | -322.2% |
| 1983 | 312.5 % change on previous year | -212.5% |
| 1984 | -76.47 % change on previous year | -124.5% |
| 1985 | 50 % change on previous year | -165.4% |
| 1986 | -54.17 % change on previous year | -208.3% |
| 1988 | 11.51 % change on previous year | -121.2% |
| 1989 | 25.31 % change on previous year | +119.9% |
| 1990 | -6.27 % change on previous year | -124.8% |
| 1991 | -54.6 % change on previous year | +770.2% |
| 1992 | 137.33 % change on previous year | -351.5% |
| 1993 | 34.56 % change on previous year | -74.8% |
| 1994 | -21.79 % change on previous year | -163.0% |
| 1995 | -93.54 % change on previous year | +329.3% |
| 1996 | -97.14 % change on previous year | +3.8% |
| 1998 | -40.43 % change on previous year | -58.4% |
| 2001 | 750 % change on previous year | -1955.3% |
| 2002 | -76.47 % change on previous year | -110.2% |
| 2004 | -8.26 % change on previous year | -89.2% |
| 2006 | -88.18 % change on previous year | +968.0% |
| 2007 | -65.45 % change on previous year | -25.8% |
| 2008 | 309.41 % change on previous year | -572.8% |
| 2009 | 10.06 % change on previous year | -96.7% |
| 2010 | -81.2 % change on previous year | -907.4% |
| 2011 | 200 % change on previous year | -346.3% |
| 2012 | -61.11 % change on previous year | -130.6% |
| 2013 | -14.29 % change on previous year | -76.6% |
| 2014 | 363.89 % change on previous year | -2647.2% |
| 2015 | -63.83 % change on previous year | -117.5% |
| 2016 | 92.53 % change on previous year | -245.0% |
| 2017 | 18.66 % change on previous year | -79.8% |
| 2018 | -3.56 % change on previous year | -119.1% |
| 2019 | -46.77 % change on previous year | +1212.6% |
| 2020 | -8.74 % change on previous year | -81.3% |
| 2021 | 37.95 % change on previous year | -534.2% |
| 2022 | 2.18 % change on previous year | -94.2% |
| 2023 | -75.8 % change on previous year | -3572.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 2 |
| 1970s | 85.09 % change on previous year | -128.57 % change on previous year | 514.82 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1980s | 12.88 % change on previous year | -277.78 % change on previous year | 312.5 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1990s | -17.74 % change on previous year | -97.14 % change on previous year | 137.33 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 2000s | 118.73 % change on previous year | -88.18 % change on previous year | 750 % change on previous year | 7 |
| 2010s | 40.43 % change on previous year | -81.2 % change on previous year | 363.89 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -11.1 % change on previous year | -75.8 % change on previous year | 37.95 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sri Lanka
- 110 Sierra Leone -65.56 % change on previous year compare
- 111 Colombia -68.03 % change on previous year compare
- 112 Zambia -74.56 % change on previous year compare
- 114 Jamaica -76 % change on previous year compare
- 115 Zimbabwe -78.45 % change on previous year compare
- 116 Moldova -81.25 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sri Lanka
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 743,046 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 104,629 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 28.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 3.69 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 26.12 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.01 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 9.57 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 441,093 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 76.61 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), annual in Sri Lanka?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), annual in Sri Lanka was -75.8 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), annual recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The highest recorded value was 750 % change on previous year in 2001.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), annual recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The lowest recorded value was -277.78 % change on previous year in 1982.
- How does Sri Lanka rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), annual?
- Sri Lanka ranks 113th out of 140 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), annual rising or falling in Sri Lanka?
- Over the last ten years it is down 430.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sri Lanka data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 49 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.