Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Uruguay
Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 0.2617 current US$ per person in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Uruguay, 1960–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per person.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Uruguay is 0.2617 current US$ per person, measured in 2017.
That represents a change of up 24.5% on the previous year and up 256.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Uruguay peaked at 6.65 current US$ per person in 1993 and was at its lowest, -1 current US$ per person, in 2003.
That places Uruguay 45th out of 154 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | current US$ per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0.0079 current US$ per person | — |
| 1961 | 0.0351 current US$ per person | +344.4% |
| 1962 | 0.0733 current US$ per person | +108.6% |
| 1963 | -0.0114 current US$ per person | -115.6% |
| 1964 | 0.3995 current US$ per person | -3594.2% |
| 1965 | 0.1044 current US$ per person | -73.9% |
| 1967 | 0.0183 current US$ per person | -82.5% |
| 1968 | 0.0182 current US$ per person | -0.8% |
| 1969 | 0.018 current US$ per person | -0.7% |
| 1970 | 0.0358 current US$ per person | +98.8% |
| 1971 | 0.0428 current US$ per person | +19.3% |
| 1973 | 1.96 current US$ per person | +4475.0% |
| 1974 | -0.0736 current US$ per person | -103.8% |
| 1975 | 0.0661 current US$ per person | -189.9% |
| 1976 | 0.0277 current US$ per person | -58.2% |
| 1977 | -0.134 current US$ per person | -584.5% |
| 1978 | -0.1333 current US$ per person | -0.6% |
| 1979 | -0.1667 current US$ per person | +25.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0949 current US$ per person | -156.9% |
| 1981 | 0.0776 current US$ per person | -18.2% |
| 1982 | 0.1042 current US$ per person | +34.2% |
| 1983 | 0.077 current US$ per person | -26.1% |
| 1984 | 0.1432 current US$ per person | +86.1% |
| 1985 | 0.1624 current US$ per person | +13.4% |
| 1986 | 0.2275 current US$ per person | +40.1% |
| 1987 | 0.3312 current US$ per person | +45.6% |
| 1988 | 1.23 current US$ per person | +271.1% |
| 1989 | 2.07 current US$ per person | +68.5% |
| 1990 | 2.76 current US$ per person | +33.3% |
| 1991 | 3.96 current US$ per person | +43.3% |
| 1992 | 4.82 current US$ per person | +21.8% |
| 1993 | 6.65 current US$ per person | +38.2% |
| 1994 | 1.1 current US$ per person | -83.4% |
| 1995 | 0.3292 current US$ per person | -70.2% |
| 1996 | 0.2339 current US$ per person | -28.9% |
| 1997 | -0.6143 current US$ per person | -362.6% |
| 1998 | -0.8983 current US$ per person | +46.2% |
| 1999 | -0.8052 current US$ per person | -10.4% |
| 2000 | -0.6062 current US$ per person | -24.7% |
| 2001 | -0.6292 current US$ per person | +3.8% |
| 2002 | -0.8997 current US$ per person | +43.0% |
| 2003 | -1 current US$ per person | +11.4% |
| 2004 | 0.1675 current US$ per person | -116.7% |
| 2005 | -0.8369 current US$ per person | -599.6% |
| 2006 | -0.9272 current US$ per person | +10.8% |
| 2007 | -0.1669 current US$ per person | -82.0% |
| 2008 | -0.4542 current US$ per person | +172.1% |
| 2009 | 4.03 current US$ per person | -987.2% |
| 2010 | 2.59 current US$ per person | -35.6% |
| 2011 | 0.2675 current US$ per person | -89.7% |
| 2012 | 0.1289 current US$ per person | -51.8% |
| 2013 | 0.1734 current US$ per person | +34.5% |
| 2014 | 0.0149 current US$ per person | -91.4% |
| 2015 | 0.005 current US$ per person | -66.8% |
| 2016 | 0.2102 current US$ per person | +4145.2% |
| 2017 | 0.2617 current US$ per person | +24.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0737 current US$ per person | -0.0114 current US$ per person | 0.3995 current US$ per person | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.1801 current US$ per person | -0.1667 current US$ per person | 1.96 current US$ per person | 9 |
| 1980s | 0.4517 current US$ per person | 0.077 current US$ per person | 2.07 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.75 current US$ per person | -0.8983 current US$ per person | 6.65 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.1325 current US$ per person | -1 current US$ per person | 4.03 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.457 current US$ per person | 0.005 current US$ per person | 2.59 current US$ per person | 8 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
- 42 Cameroon 0.3565 current US$ per person compare
- 43 Guinea-Bissau 0.3097 current US$ per person compare
- 44 Kenya 0.306 current US$ per person compare
- 46 Sierra Leone 0.2433 current US$ per person compare
- 47 Rwanda 0.2172 current US$ per person compare
- 48 Iran, Islamic Republic of 0.2098 current US$ per person compare
More aid effectiveness data for Uruguay
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 28,471 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1,127 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 171,336 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 1.14 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 120,619 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 26.21 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.11 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 390,659 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 886,704 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.87 million current US$ (2017)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Uruguay?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Uruguay was 0.2617 current US$ per person in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 6.65 current US$ per person in 1993.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was -1 current US$ per person in 2003.
- How does Uruguay rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- Uruguay ranks 45th out of 154 countries with data for 2017.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is up 256.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 56 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.