Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 0.3506 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0.3506 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 141.9%
Rank
40th
of 44 groups
All-time high
21.4 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1993
All-time low
-2.41 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) recorded 0.3506 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in 2023.
That represents a change of up 141.9% on the previous year and down 46.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) peaked at 21.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993 and was at its lowest, -2.41 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2010.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 40th of 44 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0308 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0798 current US$ per square kilometre | +159.2% |
| 1963 | 0.0421 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.2% |
| 1964 | 0.1137 current US$ per square kilometre | +170.1% |
| 1965 | 0.363 current US$ per square kilometre | +219.3% |
| 1966 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0019 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 2 current US$ per square kilometre | +105933.5% |
| 1969 | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1970 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.1% |
| 1971 | 3.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +156.2% |
| 1972 | -0.1941 current US$ per square kilometre | -106.1% |
| 1973 | 0.0119 current US$ per square kilometre | -106.1% |
| 1974 | -0.1149 current US$ per square kilometre | -1063.2% |
| 1975 | 0.0295 current US$ per square kilometre | -125.7% |
| 1976 | 0.6569 current US$ per square kilometre | +2125.5% |
| 1977 | -0.071 current US$ per square kilometre | -110.8% |
| 1978 | -0.076 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1979 | 0.0565 current US$ per square kilometre | -174.4% |
| 1980 | 0.4013 current US$ per square kilometre | +610.0% |
| 1981 | 0.2544 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.6% |
| 1982 | 0.9044 current US$ per square kilometre | +255.6% |
| 1983 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.9% |
| 1984 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.1% |
| 1985 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.2% |
| 1986 | 4.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +246.1% |
| 1987 | 8.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +110.0% |
| 1988 | 7.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1989 | 9.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
| 1990 | 4.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.4% |
| 1991 | 5.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 1992 | 18.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +264.8% |
| 1993 | 21.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1994 | 13.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.9% |
| 1995 | 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.0% |
| 1996 | 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 1997 | -0.1105 current US$ per square kilometre | -108.5% |
| 1998 | 0.9408 current US$ per square kilometre | -951.1% |
| 1999 | -0.1099 current US$ per square kilometre | -111.7% |
| 2000 | -0.9784 current US$ per square kilometre | +790.3% |
| 2001 | -0.6053 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.1% |
| 2002 | -1.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +178.5% |
| 2003 | -1.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.5% |
| 2004 | -1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 2005 | -1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.5% |
| 2006 | -1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2007 | 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -268.4% |
| 2008 | -0.9777 current US$ per square kilometre | -149.4% |
| 2009 | -2.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +140.3% |
| 2010 | -2.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2011 | -2.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 2012 | -0.745 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.9% |
| 2013 | 0.6543 current US$ per square kilometre | -187.8% |
| 2014 | 0.4241 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.2% |
| 2015 | 0.0613 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.5% |
| 2016 | -0.2774 current US$ per square kilometre | -552.5% |
| 2017 | 0.2587 current US$ per square kilometre | -193.3% |
| 2018 | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +341.3% |
| 2019 | 0.7157 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.3% |
| 2020 | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +117.3% |
| 2021 | -0.3538 current US$ per square kilometre | -122.8% |
| 2022 | -0.8361 current US$ per square kilometre | +136.3% |
| 2023 | 0.3506 current US$ per square kilometre | -141.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.531 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.4732 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1941 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2544 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 6.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1105 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.9665 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.2303 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1789 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8361 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- 37 Sierra Leone 28.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Togo 25.73 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Afghanistan 25.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Viet Nam 23.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Guinea-Bissau 23.72 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Seychelles 21.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Cameroon 21.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) was 0.3506 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 21.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.41 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 40th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 46.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.