Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific
East Asia & Pacific: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 0.2295 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific is 0.2295 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 141.9% on the previous year and down 46.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific peaked at 13.97 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993 and was at its lowest, -1.58 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2010.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 42nd of 44 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0201 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0521 current US$ per square kilometre | +159.2% |
| 1963 | 0.0275 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.2% |
| 1964 | 0.0734 current US$ per square kilometre | +167.2% |
| 1965 | 0.2902 current US$ per square kilometre | +295.5% |
| 1966 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0025 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +52966.8% |
| 1969 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1970 | 0.8124 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.1% |
| 1971 | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +156.2% |
| 1972 | -0.1267 current US$ per square kilometre | -106.1% |
| 1973 | 0.0078 current US$ per square kilometre | -106.1% |
| 1974 | -0.075 current US$ per square kilometre | -1063.2% |
| 1975 | 0.0193 current US$ per square kilometre | -125.7% |
| 1976 | 0.4288 current US$ per square kilometre | +2125.5% |
| 1977 | -0.0463 current US$ per square kilometre | -110.8% |
| 1978 | -0.0496 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1979 | 0.0369 current US$ per square kilometre | -174.4% |
| 1980 | 0.2619 current US$ per square kilometre | +610.0% |
| 1981 | 0.166 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.6% |
| 1982 | 0.5903 current US$ per square kilometre | +255.6% |
| 1983 | 0.8083 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.9% |
| 1984 | 0.6625 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.0% |
| 1985 | 0.7633 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.2% |
| 1986 | 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +246.1% |
| 1987 | 5.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +110.0% |
| 1988 | 4.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1989 | 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
| 1990 | 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.4% |
| 1991 | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 1992 | 12.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +264.8% |
| 1993 | 13.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1994 | 8.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.9% |
| 1995 | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.0% |
| 1996 | 0.8518 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 1997 | -0.0721 current US$ per square kilometre | -108.5% |
| 1998 | 0.614 current US$ per square kilometre | -951.1% |
| 1999 | -0.0717 current US$ per square kilometre | -111.7% |
| 2000 | -0.6393 current US$ per square kilometre | +791.3% |
| 2001 | -0.3955 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.1% |
| 2002 | -1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +178.5% |
| 2003 | -0.8539 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.5% |
| 2004 | -0.9945 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 2005 | -0.6816 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.5% |
| 2006 | -0.7678 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2007 | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -268.4% |
| 2008 | -0.639 current US$ per square kilometre | -149.4% |
| 2009 | -1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +140.3% |
| 2010 | -1.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2011 | -1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 2012 | -0.4869 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.9% |
| 2013 | 0.4276 current US$ per square kilometre | -187.8% |
| 2014 | 0.2772 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.2% |
| 2015 | 0.0401 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.5% |
| 2016 | -0.1812 current US$ per square kilometre | -552.3% |
| 2017 | 0.169 current US$ per square kilometre | -193.3% |
| 2018 | 0.7458 current US$ per square kilometre | +341.3% |
| 2019 | 0.4676 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.3% |
| 2020 | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +117.3% |
| 2021 | -0.2312 current US$ per square kilometre | -122.8% |
| 2022 | -0.5472 current US$ per square kilometre | +136.6% |
| 2023 | 0.2295 current US$ per square kilometre | -141.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3527 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.3089 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1267 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.166 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0721 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.6316 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.1506 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7458 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1167 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5472 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific
- 39 Afghanistan 25.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Viet Nam 23.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Guinea-Bissau 23.72 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Seychelles 21.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Cameroon 21.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Somalia 20.25 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Benin 18.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific was 0.2295 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The highest recorded value was 13.97 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.58 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- How does East Asia & Pacific rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 42nd out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific?
- Over the last ten years it is down 46.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.