Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Malawi
Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 15.7 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Malawi, 1975–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Malawi stood at 15.7 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 41.6% on the previous year and up 114.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Malawi peaked at 56.11 current US$ per square kilometre in 1988 and was at its lowest, 0.1061 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1976.
Malawi ranks 50th of 153 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Malawi, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1975 | 0.3182 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 0.1061 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 1978 | 0.1061 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.2121 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1981 | 0.5303 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.0% |
| 1982 | 0.6364 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1983 | 0.2121 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 1984 | 0.7425 current US$ per square kilometre | +250.0% |
| 1985 | 0.5303 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 1986 | 24.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +4520.0% |
| 1987 | 41.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.3% |
| 1988 | 56.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.3% |
| 1989 | 17.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.8% |
| 1990 | 4.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.5% |
| 1991 | 15.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +208.5% |
| 1992 | 8.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.8% |
| 1993 | 20.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +130.1% |
| 1995 | 21.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1997 | 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.1% |
| 1998 | 5.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +115.4% |
| 2000 | 0.5303 current US$ per square kilometre | -91.1% |
| 2002 | 17.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +3180.0% |
| 2003 | 0.1061 current US$ per square kilometre | -99.4% |
| 2004 | 8.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +7600.0% |
| 2005 | 0.1061 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.7% |
| 2006 | 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +1800.0% |
| 2007 | 15.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +684.2% |
| 2008 | 8.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.0% |
| 2009 | 14.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.6% |
| 2010 | 24.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.4% |
| 2011 | 16.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.0% |
| 2012 | 9.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.2% |
| 2013 | 7.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.5% |
| 2014 | 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.7% |
| 2015 | 7.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +95.0% |
| 2016 | 8.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.9% |
| 2017 | 12.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.7% |
| 2018 | 8.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.3% |
| 2019 | 4.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.6% |
| 2020 | 10.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +124.0% |
| 2021 | 17.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.8% |
| 2022 | 26.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.1% |
| 2023 | 15.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.1856 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1061 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3182 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 1980s | 15.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2121 current US$ per square kilometre | 56.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1990s | 11.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 2000s | 7.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1061 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2010s | 10.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 17.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Malawi
- 47 Republic of Korea 17.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 48 Libya 16.55 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 49 Guatemala 15.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 51 Armenia 14.3 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 52 Romania 13.78 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 53 Solomon Islands 13.47 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Malawi
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 239,066 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 3.64 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 9.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 152.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 61.90 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 40.03 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 43.98 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Malawi?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Malawi was 15.7 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Malawi?
- The highest recorded value was 56.11 current US$ per square kilometre in 1988.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Malawi?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1061 current US$ per square kilometre in 1976.
- How does Malawi rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- Malawi ranks 50th out of 153 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in Malawi?
- Over the last ten years it is up 114.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Malawi data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 43 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.