Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in OECD members
OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2022)
1.3 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 59.6%
Rank
39th
of 44 groups
All-time high
4.78 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1992
All-time low
-0.4932 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2006
Years of data
53
1970–2022
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in OECD members, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in OECD members stood at 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 59.6% on the previous year and up 5,174.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in OECD members peaked at 4.78 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992 and was at its lowest, -0.4932 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2006.
OECD members ranks 39th of 44 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in OECD members, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.1789 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.6389 current US$ per square kilometre | +257.1% |
| 1972 | -0.1855 current US$ per square kilometre | -129.0% |
| 1973 | 0.2446 current US$ per square kilometre | -231.9% |
| 1974 | -0.2321 current US$ per square kilometre | -194.9% |
| 1975 | -0.1818 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 1976 | 0.2577 current US$ per square kilometre | -241.8% |
| 1977 | -0.2554 current US$ per square kilometre | -199.1% |
| 1978 | 0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre | -101.4% |
| 1979 | 0.0233 current US$ per square kilometre | +530.8% |
| 1980 | 0.0617 current US$ per square kilometre | +164.6% |
| 1981 | 0.0586 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1982 | 0.7734 current US$ per square kilometre | +1219.9% |
| 1983 | 0.1798 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.8% |
| 1984 | 0.9169 current US$ per square kilometre | +410.0% |
| 1985 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.3% |
| 1986 | 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 1987 | 0.6571 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.8% |
| 1988 | 0.782 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 1989 | 0.8614 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1990 | 3.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +351.8% |
| 1991 | 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.6% |
| 1992 | 4.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.9% |
| 1993 | 0.959 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.0% |
| 1994 | 0.7024 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.8% |
| 1995 | 0.472 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.8% |
| 1996 | 0.2273 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.9% |
| 1997 | -0.1134 current US$ per square kilometre | -149.9% |
| 1998 | -0.0099 current US$ per square kilometre | -91.3% |
| 1999 | 0.051 current US$ per square kilometre | -617.1% |
| 2000 | -0.0132 current US$ per square kilometre | -125.9% |
| 2001 | -0.022 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.0% |
| 2002 | -0.2498 current US$ per square kilometre | +1037.2% |
| 2003 | -0.1065 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.4% |
| 2004 | -0.0775 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.2% |
| 2005 | -0.3552 current US$ per square kilometre | +358.5% |
| 2006 | -0.4932 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.9% |
| 2007 | -0.1865 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.2% |
| 2008 | 0.1967 current US$ per square kilometre | -205.5% |
| 2009 | -0.2012 current US$ per square kilometre | -202.3% |
| 2010 | -0.3308 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.4% |
| 2011 | -0.009 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.3% |
| 2012 | -0.0256 current US$ per square kilometre | +184.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0194 current US$ per square kilometre | -175.8% |
| 2014 | 0.0693 current US$ per square kilometre | +256.5% |
| 2015 | 0.0789 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 2016 | 2.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +2482.4% |
| 2017 | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 2018 | 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.8% |
| 2019 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.9% |
| 2020 | 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2021 | 0.8153 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.8% |
| 2022 | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0492 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2554 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6389 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6717 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0586 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1134 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.1508 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4932 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1967 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.8241 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3308 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8153 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near OECD members
- 36 Kenya 29.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Sierra Leone 28.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Togo 25.73 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Afghanistan 25.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Viet Nam 23.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Guinea-Bissau 23.72 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Seychelles 21.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for OECD members
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 31.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 14.83 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 75.99 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.64 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 39.41 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 387.66 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 673.54 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 108.61 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 45.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 477.76 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in OECD members?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in OECD members was 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in OECD members?
- The highest recorded value was 4.78 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in OECD members?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.4932 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- How does OECD members rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- OECD members ranks 39th out of 44 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in OECD members?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5,174.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this OECD members data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.