Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 12.71 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
12.71 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 26.2%
Rank
22nd
of 44 groups
All-time high
68.54 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1988
All-time low
0.3312 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1972
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Sub-Saharan Africa recorded 12.71 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 26.2% on the previous year and up 157.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa peaked at 68.54 current US$ per square kilometre in 1988 and was at its lowest, 0.3312 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1972.
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 22nd of 44 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.9185 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.6221 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.3% |
| 1963 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +79.4% |
| 1964 | 0.8143 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.0% |
| 1965 | 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.2% |
| 1966 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1967 | 2.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.4% |
| 1968 | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 1969 | 0.8058 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.1% |
| 1970 | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.2% |
| 1971 | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1972 | 0.3312 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.3% |
| 1973 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +240.9% |
| 1974 | 0.6365 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.6% |
| 1975 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +101.7% |
| 1976 | 0.5626 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.2% |
| 1977 | 0.6698 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.1% |
| 1978 | 0.8907 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.0% |
| 1979 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.4% |
| 1980 | 2.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +143.9% |
| 1981 | 4.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.2% |
| 1982 | 8 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.4% |
| 1983 | 11.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.1% |
| 1984 | 19.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.7% |
| 1985 | 24.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.8% |
| 1986 | 47.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.9% |
| 1987 | 58.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.5% |
| 1988 | 68.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 1989 | 54.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.7% |
| 1990 | 53.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1991 | 31.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.8% |
| 1992 | 34.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 1993 | 24.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.0% |
| 1994 | 17.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.6% |
| 1995 | 16.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1996 | 15.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 1997 | 13.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 1998 | 20.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.8% |
| 1999 | 11.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.7% |
| 2000 | 12.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2001 | 9.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.3% |
| 2002 | 37.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +311.7% |
| 2003 | 32.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 2004 | 14.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.4% |
| 2005 | 40.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +172.9% |
| 2006 | 49.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 2007 | 11.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.9% |
| 2008 | 16.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.8% |
| 2009 | 18.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 2010 | 16.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.7% |
| 2011 | 36.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +127.2% |
| 2012 | 4.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.2% |
| 2013 | 4.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 2014 | 6.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.3% |
| 2015 | 8.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2016 | 12.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.5% |
| 2017 | 14.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2018 | 13.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2019 | 12.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 2020 | 13.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2021 | 39.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +199.8% |
| 2022 | 17.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.6% |
| 2023 | 12.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6221 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.9224 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3312 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 30.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 68.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 23.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 53.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 24.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 49.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 20.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sub-Saharan Africa
- 19 Senegal 138.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Republic of Moldova 124.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 Rwanda 122.86 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Bosnia and Herzegovina 119.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Suriname 87.86 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Haiti 79.25 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Tonga 72.85 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sub-Saharan Africa
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 121.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 460.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.49 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.04 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 658.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 4.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.95 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.40 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 303.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.70 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa was 12.71 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 68.54 current US$ per square kilometre in 1988.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3312 current US$ per square kilometre in 1972.
- How does Sub-Saharan Africa rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 22nd out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is up 157.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sub-Saharan Africa data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.