Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy in Africa Western and Central
Africa Western and Central: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy was 88.12 million current US$ in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy in Africa Western and Central, 1970–2019
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Africa Western and Central recorded 88.12 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy in 2019.
That represents a change of down 11.0% on the previous year and down 62.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy in Africa Western and Central peaked at 838.12 million current US$ in 2006 and was at its lowest, -1.17 million current US$, in 1972.
That places Africa Western and Central 30th out of 44 groups with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy in Africa Western and Central, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 6.62 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 3.03 million current US$ | -54.2% |
| 1972 | -1.17 million current US$ | -138.6% |
| 1973 | 6.08 million current US$ | -619.7% |
| 1974 | 1.39 million current US$ | -77.1% |
| 1975 | 14.22 million current US$ | +923.0% |
| 1976 | 2.16 million current US$ | -84.8% |
| 1977 | 1.93 million current US$ | -10.6% |
| 1978 | 1.37 million current US$ | -29.0% |
| 1979 | 2.21 million current US$ | +61.3% |
| 1980 | 2.43 million current US$ | +10.0% |
| 1981 | 7.90 million current US$ | +225.1% |
| 1982 | 24.47 million current US$ | +209.7% |
| 1983 | 50.02 million current US$ | +104.4% |
| 1984 | 58.18 million current US$ | +16.3% |
| 1985 | 112.42 million current US$ | +93.2% |
| 1986 | 281.00 million current US$ | +150.0% |
| 1987 | 188.25 million current US$ | -33.0% |
| 1988 | 259.15 million current US$ | +37.7% |
| 1989 | 339.98 million current US$ | +31.2% |
| 1990 | 225.92 million current US$ | -33.5% |
| 1991 | 167.73 million current US$ | -25.8% |
| 1992 | 177.46 million current US$ | +5.8% |
| 1993 | 127.32 million current US$ | -28.3% |
| 1994 | 94.31 million current US$ | -25.9% |
| 1995 | 87.81 million current US$ | -6.9% |
| 1996 | 146.74 million current US$ | +67.1% |
| 1997 | 66.82 million current US$ | -54.5% |
| 1998 | 64.32 million current US$ | -3.7% |
| 1999 | 89.61 million current US$ | +39.3% |
| 2000 | 74.58 million current US$ | -16.8% |
| 2001 | 19.10 million current US$ | -74.4% |
| 2002 | 86.35 million current US$ | +352.1% |
| 2003 | 93.28 million current US$ | +8.0% |
| 2004 | 107.76 million current US$ | +15.5% |
| 2005 | 615.12 million current US$ | +470.8% |
| 2006 | 838.12 million current US$ | +36.3% |
| 2007 | 80.51 million current US$ | -90.4% |
| 2008 | 85.30 million current US$ | +5.9% |
| 2009 | 234.16 million current US$ | +174.5% |
| 2010 | 201.00 million current US$ | -14.2% |
| 2011 | 46.14 million current US$ | -77.0% |
| 2012 | 23.00 million current US$ | -50.2% |
| 2013 | 55.89 million current US$ | +143.0% |
| 2014 | 44.48 million current US$ | -20.4% |
| 2015 | 60.46 million current US$ | +35.9% |
| 2016 | 166.08 million current US$ | +174.7% |
| 2017 | 157.61 million current US$ | -5.1% |
| 2018 | 99.01 million current US$ | -37.2% |
| 2019 | 88.12 million current US$ | -11.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 3.78 million current US$ | -1.17 million current US$ | 14.22 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 132.38 million current US$ | 2.43 million current US$ | 339.98 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 124.80 million current US$ | 64.32 million current US$ | 225.92 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 223.43 million current US$ | 19.10 million current US$ | 838.12 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 94.18 million current US$ | 23.00 million current US$ | 201.00 million current US$ | 10 |
Countries ranked near Africa Western and Central
- 27 Albania 7.59 million current US$ compare
- 28 Viet Nam 7.46 million current US$ compare
- 29 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 7.22 million current US$ compare
- 30 Egypt 7.16 million current US$ compare
- 31 Central African Republic 7.13 million current US$ compare
- 32 Tanzania, United Republic of 7.07 million current US$ compare
- 33 Cuba 7.07 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Africa Western and Central
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 16.65 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 125.72 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 310.97 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 1.72 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 216.58 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.07 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.82 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 592.48 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 363.44 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway 95.03 million current US$ (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy in Africa Western and Central?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy in Africa Western and Central was 88.12 million current US$ in 2019, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy recorded in Africa Western and Central?
- The highest recorded value was 838.12 million current US$ in 2006.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy recorded in Africa Western and Central?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.17 million current US$ in 1972.
- How does Africa Western and Central rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy?
- Africa Western and Central ranks 30th out of 44 groups with data for 2019.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy rising or falling in Africa Western and Central?
- Over the last ten years it is down 62.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Africa Western and Central data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 50 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.