Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), annual in IDA blend
IDA blend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), annual was -74.01 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), annual in IDA blend, 1971–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), annual in IDA blend stood at -74.01 % change on previous year.
The figure is down 190.2% on the previous year and down 117.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), annual in IDA blend peaked at 512.64 % change on previous year in 2006 and was at its lowest, -88 % change on previous year, in 2007.
IDA blend ranks 42nd of 44 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), annual in IDA blend, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | -2.05 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | -83.96 % change on previous year | +3991.5% |
| 1973 | 146.49 % change on previous year | -274.5% |
| 1974 | 92.99 % change on previous year | -36.5% |
| 1975 | 59.08 % change on previous year | -36.5% |
| 1976 | -14.79 % change on previous year | -125.0% |
| 1977 | -7.3 % change on previous year | -50.7% |
| 1978 | 56.79 % change on previous year | -878.3% |
| 1979 | 214.37 % change on previous year | +277.5% |
| 1980 | -30.18 % change on previous year | -114.1% |
| 1981 | 4.35 % change on previous year | -114.4% |
| 1982 | -11.92 % change on previous year | -374.1% |
| 1983 | 19.83 % change on previous year | -266.3% |
| 1984 | -18.96 % change on previous year | -195.6% |
| 1985 | 13 % change on previous year | -168.6% |
| 1986 | 67.38 % change on previous year | +418.4% |
| 1987 | 5.42 % change on previous year | -92.0% |
| 1988 | 125.31 % change on previous year | +2210.3% |
| 1989 | -3.1 % change on previous year | -102.5% |
| 1990 | -21 % change on previous year | +577.2% |
| 1991 | 4.12 % change on previous year | -119.6% |
| 1992 | 11.75 % change on previous year | +185.2% |
| 1993 | -16.33 % change on previous year | -238.9% |
| 1994 | 8.7 % change on previous year | -153.3% |
| 1995 | 30.18 % change on previous year | +246.8% |
| 1996 | -5.22 % change on previous year | -117.3% |
| 1997 | -36.9 % change on previous year | +606.8% |
| 1998 | 102.42 % change on previous year | -377.5% |
| 1999 | -33.39 % change on previous year | -132.6% |
| 2000 | 28.36 % change on previous year | -184.9% |
| 2001 | -33.33 % change on previous year | -217.5% |
| 2002 | 8.99 % change on previous year | -127.0% |
| 2003 | -13.76 % change on previous year | -253.1% |
| 2004 | -4.86 % change on previous year | -64.7% |
| 2005 | -13.14 % change on previous year | +170.4% |
| 2006 | 512.64 % change on previous year | -4002.0% |
| 2007 | -88 % change on previous year | -117.2% |
| 2008 | -48.87 % change on previous year | -44.5% |
| 2009 | 139.73 % change on previous year | -385.9% |
| 2010 | 47.27 % change on previous year | -66.2% |
| 2011 | 80.9 % change on previous year | +71.1% |
| 2012 | -34.1 % change on previous year | -142.2% |
| 2013 | 16.68 % change on previous year | -148.9% |
| 2014 | -27.06 % change on previous year | -262.3% |
| 2015 | 28.09 % change on previous year | -203.8% |
| 2016 | 7.96 % change on previous year | -71.6% |
| 2017 | -35.11 % change on previous year | -540.9% |
| 2018 | -15.29 % change on previous year | -56.5% |
| 2019 | 96.76 % change on previous year | -733.0% |
| 2020 | 2.63 % change on previous year | -97.3% |
| 2021 | 82.07 % change on previous year | +3018.4% |
| 2022 | -74.01 % change on previous year | -190.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 51.29 % change on previous year | -83.96 % change on previous year | 214.37 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1980s | 17.11 % change on previous year | -30.18 % change on previous year | 125.31 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.43 % change on previous year | -36.9 % change on previous year | 102.42 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 48.78 % change on previous year | -88 % change on previous year | 512.64 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 16.61 % change on previous year | -35.11 % change on previous year | 96.76 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.56 % change on previous year | -74.01 % change on previous year | 82.07 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near IDA blend
- 39 Samoa 77 % change on previous year compare
- 40 Costa Rica 64.41 % change on previous year compare
- 41 Iraq 63.66 % change on previous year compare
- 42 Macau, China 61.54 % change on previous year compare
- 43 Malawi 61.42 % change on previous year compare
- 44 Bahamas 60 % change on previous year compare
- 45 Liberia 52.68 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for IDA blend
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 13.45 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.88 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 202.73 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 612.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 62.05 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 438.92 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 753.26 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 317.55 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 59.79 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 324.78 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), annual in IDA blend?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), annual in IDA blend was -74.01 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), annual recorded in IDA blend?
- The highest recorded value was 512.64 % change on previous year in 2006.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), annual recorded in IDA blend?
- The lowest recorded value was -88 % change on previous year in 2007.
- How does IDA blend rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), annual?
- IDA blend ranks 42nd out of 44 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), annual rising or falling in IDA blend?
- Over the last ten years it is down 117.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this IDA blend data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.