Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps was -3.09 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Costa Rica, 1963–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Costa Rica recorded -3.09 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in 2023.
That represents a change of up 64.4% on the previous year and up 63.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Costa Rica peaked at 63.74 million current US$ in 2010 and was at its lowest, -17.49 million current US$, in 1996.
That places Costa Rica 157th out of 173 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1963 | 10,000 current US$ | — |
| 1964 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 20,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1968 | 20,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 10,000 current US$ | -50.0% |
| 1970 | 20,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1971 | 40,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1972 | 50,000 current US$ | +25.0% |
| 1973 | 80,000 current US$ | +60.0% |
| 1974 | 260,000 current US$ | +225.0% |
| 1975 | 310,000 current US$ | +19.2% |
| 1976 | 530,000 current US$ | +71.0% |
| 1977 | 1.37 million current US$ | +158.5% |
| 1978 | 18.75 million current US$ | +1268.6% |
| 1979 | 9.55 million current US$ | -49.1% |
| 1980 | 3.59 million current US$ | -62.4% |
| 1981 | 4.74 million current US$ | +32.0% |
| 1982 | 1.39 million current US$ | -70.7% |
| 1983 | 770,000 current US$ | -44.6% |
| 1984 | 890,000 current US$ | +15.6% |
| 1985 | 550,000 current US$ | -38.2% |
| 1986 | 2.81 million current US$ | +410.9% |
| 1987 | 4.76 million current US$ | +69.4% |
| 1988 | 6.32 million current US$ | +32.8% |
| 1989 | 8.41 million current US$ | +33.1% |
| 1990 | 40.10 million current US$ | +376.8% |
| 1991 | 49.32 million current US$ | +23.0% |
| 1992 | 61.10 million current US$ | +23.9% |
| 1993 | 12.55 million current US$ | -79.5% |
| 1994 | 17.07 million current US$ | +36.0% |
| 1995 | -11.53 million current US$ | -167.5% |
| 1996 | -17.49 million current US$ | +51.7% |
| 1997 | -7.40 million current US$ | -57.7% |
| 1998 | -3.97 million current US$ | -46.4% |
| 1999 | -5.67 million current US$ | +42.8% |
| 2000 | -6.28 million current US$ | +10.8% |
| 2001 | -3.13 million current US$ | -50.2% |
| 2002 | -2.82 million current US$ | -9.9% |
| 2003 | -4.24 million current US$ | +50.4% |
| 2004 | -5.24 million current US$ | +23.6% |
| 2005 | -1.41 million current US$ | -73.1% |
| 2006 | 6.08 million current US$ | -531.2% |
| 2007 | 17.32 million current US$ | +184.9% |
| 2008 | -1.16 million current US$ | -106.7% |
| 2009 | 58.29 million current US$ | -5125.0% |
| 2010 | 63.74 million current US$ | +9.3% |
| 2011 | -2.84 million current US$ | -104.5% |
| 2012 | -8.43 million current US$ | +196.8% |
| 2013 | -8.35 million current US$ | -0.9% |
| 2014 | 2.89 million current US$ | -134.6% |
| 2015 | 49.68 million current US$ | +1619.0% |
| 2016 | 28.44 million current US$ | -42.8% |
| 2017 | 38.97 million current US$ | +37.0% |
| 2018 | 32.09 million current US$ | -17.7% |
| 2019 | 18.69 million current US$ | -41.8% |
| 2020 | -2.34 million current US$ | -112.5% |
| 2021 | -5.93 million current US$ | +153.6% |
| 2022 | -8.68 million current US$ | +46.3% |
| 2023 | -3.09 million current US$ | -64.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12,857 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 7 |
| 1970s | 3.10 million current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 18.75 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.42 million current US$ | 550,000 current US$ | 8.41 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 13.41 million current US$ | -17.49 million current US$ | 61.10 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 5.74 million current US$ | -6.28 million current US$ | 58.29 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 21.49 million current US$ | -8.43 million current US$ | 63.74 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | -5.01 million current US$ | -8.68 million current US$ | -2.34 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
More aid effectiveness data for Costa Rica
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 287,578 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 55,010 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 734,559 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 31,872 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 5.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 60.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 414,114 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 576,025 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -3.09 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Costa Rica?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Costa Rica was -3.09 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 63.74 million current US$ in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was -17.49 million current US$ in 1996.
- How does Costa Rica rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
- Costa Rica ranks 157th out of 173 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 63.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 61 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.