Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Mozambique
Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps was 120.62 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Mozambique, 1968–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Mozambique recorded 120.62 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in 2023.
That represents a change of up 15.7% on the previous year and up 22.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Mozambique peaked at 148.61 million current US$ in 2017 and was at its lowest, 10,000 current US$, in 1968.
Mozambique ranks 18th of 173 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Mozambique, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1968 | 10,000 current US$ | — |
| 1975 | 400,000 current US$ | +3900.0% |
| 1976 | 1.25 million current US$ | +212.5% |
| 1977 | 2.10 million current US$ | +68.0% |
| 1978 | 3.09 million current US$ | +47.1% |
| 1979 | 4.08 million current US$ | +32.0% |
| 1980 | 5.07 million current US$ | +24.3% |
| 1981 | 120,000 current US$ | -97.6% |
| 1982 | 7.72 million current US$ | +6333.3% |
| 1983 | 7.49 million current US$ | -3.0% |
| 1984 | 6.30 million current US$ | -15.9% |
| 1985 | 4.35 million current US$ | -31.0% |
| 1986 | 15.50 million current US$ | +256.3% |
| 1987 | 17.59 million current US$ | +13.5% |
| 1988 | 14.82 million current US$ | -15.7% |
| 1989 | 51.09 million current US$ | +244.7% |
| 1990 | 16.95 million current US$ | -66.8% |
| 1991 | 15.83 million current US$ | -6.6% |
| 1992 | 38.69 million current US$ | +144.4% |
| 1993 | 18.92 million current US$ | -51.1% |
| 1994 | 43.32 million current US$ | +129.0% |
| 1995 | 39.76 million current US$ | -8.2% |
| 1996 | 30.05 million current US$ | -24.4% |
| 1997 | 38.11 million current US$ | +26.8% |
| 1998 | 40.61 million current US$ | +6.6% |
| 1999 | 63.28 million current US$ | +55.8% |
| 2000 | 19.95 million current US$ | -68.5% |
| 2001 | 33.52 million current US$ | +68.0% |
| 2002 | 69.66 million current US$ | +107.8% |
| 2003 | 35.27 million current US$ | -49.4% |
| 2004 | 19.41 million current US$ | -45.0% |
| 2005 | 14.77 million current US$ | -23.9% |
| 2006 | 106.83 million current US$ | +623.3% |
| 2007 | 27.77 million current US$ | -74.0% |
| 2008 | 23.72 million current US$ | -14.6% |
| 2009 | 60.67 million current US$ | +155.8% |
| 2010 | 62.85 million current US$ | +3.6% |
| 2011 | 48.77 million current US$ | -22.4% |
| 2012 | 70.30 million current US$ | +44.1% |
| 2013 | 98.37 million current US$ | +39.9% |
| 2014 | 85.28 million current US$ | -13.3% |
| 2015 | 62.65 million current US$ | -26.5% |
| 2016 | 89.47 million current US$ | +42.8% |
| 2017 | 148.61 million current US$ | +66.1% |
| 2018 | 142.94 million current US$ | -3.8% |
| 2019 | 91.79 million current US$ | -35.8% |
| 2020 | 71.32 million current US$ | -22.3% |
| 2021 | 69.70 million current US$ | -2.3% |
| 2022 | 104.24 million current US$ | +49.5% |
| 2023 | 120.62 million current US$ | +15.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 1 |
| 1970s | 2.18 million current US$ | 400,000 current US$ | 4.08 million current US$ | 5 |
| 1980s | 13.01 million current US$ | 120,000 current US$ | 51.09 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 34.55 million current US$ | 15.83 million current US$ | 63.28 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 41.16 million current US$ | 14.77 million current US$ | 106.83 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 90.10 million current US$ | 48.77 million current US$ | 148.61 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 91.47 million current US$ | 69.70 million current US$ | 120.62 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mozambique
- 15 Viet Nam 149.31 million current US$ compare
- 16 Republic of Moldova 130.00 million current US$ compare
- 17 Côte d'Ivoire 127.97 million current US$ compare
- 19 Botswana 110.59 million current US$ compare
- 20 Indonesia 102.57 million current US$ compare
- 21 Madagascar 100.30 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Mozambique
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 12.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 17.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 55.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 143.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 35.43 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 60.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 9.71 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 38.52 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 33.56 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 120.62 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Mozambique?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Mozambique was 120.62 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Mozambique?
- The highest recorded value was 148.61 million current US$ in 2017.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Mozambique?
- The lowest recorded value was 10,000 current US$ in 1968.
- How does Mozambique rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
- Mozambique ranks 18th out of 173 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Mozambique?
- Over the last ten years it is up 22.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mozambique data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 50 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.