Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Rwanda
Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps was 22.16 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Rwanda, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Rwanda is 22.16 million current US$, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 67.2% on the previous year and down 55.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Rwanda peaked at 78.69 million current US$ in 2019 and was at its lowest, 10,000 current US$, in 1973.
Rwanda ranks 56th of 173 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Rwanda, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 20,000 current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 20,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 40,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1973 | 10,000 current US$ | -75.0% |
| 1974 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 720,000 current US$ | +7100.0% |
| 1976 | 2.78 million current US$ | +286.1% |
| 1977 | 370,000 current US$ | -86.7% |
| 1978 | 2.02 million current US$ | +445.9% |
| 1979 | 5.17 million current US$ | +155.9% |
| 1980 | 5.14 million current US$ | -0.6% |
| 1981 | 4.41 million current US$ | -14.2% |
| 1982 | 3.20 million current US$ | -27.4% |
| 1983 | 5.85 million current US$ | +82.8% |
| 1984 | 3.07 million current US$ | -47.5% |
| 1985 | 1.64 million current US$ | -46.6% |
| 1986 | 9.26 million current US$ | +464.6% |
| 1987 | 7.58 million current US$ | -18.1% |
| 1988 | 9.98 million current US$ | +31.7% |
| 1989 | 16.52 million current US$ | +65.5% |
| 1990 | 13.83 million current US$ | -16.3% |
| 1991 | 8.84 million current US$ | -36.1% |
| 1992 | 16.38 million current US$ | +85.3% |
| 1993 | 14.94 million current US$ | -8.8% |
| 1994 | 16.47 million current US$ | +10.2% |
| 1995 | 1.50 million current US$ | -90.9% |
| 1996 | 550,000 current US$ | -63.3% |
| 1997 | 8.13 million current US$ | +1378.2% |
| 1998 | 9.03 million current US$ | +11.1% |
| 1999 | 7.95 million current US$ | -12.0% |
| 2000 | 3.35 million current US$ | -57.9% |
| 2001 | 1.04 million current US$ | -69.0% |
| 2002 | 400,000 current US$ | -61.5% |
| 2003 | 660,000 current US$ | +65.0% |
| 2004 | 860,000 current US$ | +30.3% |
| 2005 | 2.85 million current US$ | +231.4% |
| 2006 | 12.74 million current US$ | +347.0% |
| 2007 | 19.53 million current US$ | +53.3% |
| 2008 | 17.75 million current US$ | -9.1% |
| 2009 | 21.34 million current US$ | +20.2% |
| 2010 | 22.82 million current US$ | +6.9% |
| 2011 | 24.38 million current US$ | +6.8% |
| 2012 | 32.79 million current US$ | +34.5% |
| 2013 | 49.86 million current US$ | +52.1% |
| 2014 | 22.61 million current US$ | -54.7% |
| 2015 | 16.39 million current US$ | -27.5% |
| 2016 | 27.40 million current US$ | +67.2% |
| 2017 | 43.32 million current US$ | +58.1% |
| 2018 | 37.75 million current US$ | -12.9% |
| 2019 | 78.69 million current US$ | +108.5% |
| 2020 | 56.01 million current US$ | -28.8% |
| 2021 | 70.93 million current US$ | +26.6% |
| 2022 | 67.48 million current US$ | -4.9% |
| 2023 | 22.16 million current US$ | -67.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.12 million current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 5.17 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 6.67 million current US$ | 1.64 million current US$ | 16.52 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 9.76 million current US$ | 550,000 current US$ | 16.47 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 8.05 million current US$ | 400,000 current US$ | 21.34 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 35.60 million current US$ | 16.39 million current US$ | 78.69 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 54.15 million current US$ | 22.16 million current US$ | 70.93 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Rwanda
- 53 Slovakia 22.84 million current US$ compare
- 54 Kiribati 22.49 million current US$ compare
- 55 Solomon Islands 22.29 million current US$ compare
- 57 Burkina Faso 20.57 million current US$ compare
- 58 Burundi 20.08 million current US$ compare
- 59 Mauritania 18.95 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Rwanda
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 329,220 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 38.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 56.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 10.29 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 77.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 83.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 22.70 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 3.03 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 22.16 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Rwanda?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Rwanda was 22.16 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Rwanda?
- The highest recorded value was 78.69 million current US$ in 2019.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Rwanda?
- The lowest recorded value was 10,000 current US$ in 1973.
- How does Rwanda rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
- Rwanda ranks 56th out of 173 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Rwanda?
- Over the last ten years it is down 55.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Rwanda data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.