Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Timor-Leste
Timor-Leste: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps was 27.62 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Timor-Leste, 1974–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Timor-Leste is 27.62 million current US$, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 41.6% on the previous year and up 24.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Timor-Leste peaked at 49.10 million current US$ in 2019 and was at its lowest, 10,000 current US$, in 1974.
Timor-Leste ranks 45th of 173 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Timor-Leste, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1974 | 10,000 current US$ | — |
| 1991 | 340,000 current US$ | +3300.0% |
| 1992 | 250,000 current US$ | -26.5% |
| 1993 | 160,000 current US$ | -36.0% |
| 1994 | 70,000 current US$ | -56.2% |
| 2000 | 29.07 million current US$ | +41428.6% |
| 2001 | 8.93 million current US$ | -69.3% |
| 2002 | 5.74 million current US$ | -35.7% |
| 2003 | 8.93 million current US$ | +55.6% |
| 2004 | 9.88 million current US$ | +10.6% |
| 2005 | 33.41 million current US$ | +238.2% |
| 2006 | 21.83 million current US$ | -34.7% |
| 2007 | 13.07 million current US$ | -40.1% |
| 2008 | 26.45 million current US$ | +102.4% |
| 2009 | 11.88 million current US$ | -55.1% |
| 2010 | 27.67 million current US$ | +132.9% |
| 2011 | 26.86 million current US$ | -2.9% |
| 2012 | 18.84 million current US$ | -29.9% |
| 2013 | 22.17 million current US$ | +17.7% |
| 2014 | 19.17 million current US$ | -13.5% |
| 2015 | 19.26 million current US$ | +0.5% |
| 2016 | 36.71 million current US$ | +90.6% |
| 2017 | 24.13 million current US$ | -34.3% |
| 2018 | 31.56 million current US$ | +30.8% |
| 2019 | 49.10 million current US$ | +55.6% |
| 2020 | 19.17 million current US$ | -61.0% |
| 2021 | 21.70 million current US$ | +13.2% |
| 2022 | 19.51 million current US$ | -10.1% |
| 2023 | 27.62 million current US$ | +41.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 10,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 1 |
| 1990s | 205,000 current US$ | 70,000 current US$ | 340,000 current US$ | 4 |
| 2000s | 16.92 million current US$ | 5.74 million current US$ | 33.41 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 27.55 million current US$ | 18.84 million current US$ | 49.10 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 22.00 million current US$ | 19.17 million current US$ | 27.62 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Timor-Leste
More aid effectiveness data for Timor-Leste
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 6,380 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 20,000 current US$ (2005)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 193,198 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 16.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 38,099 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 401,792 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 86,725 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 182,540 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 27.62 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Timor-Leste?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Timor-Leste was 27.62 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Timor-Leste?
- The highest recorded value was 49.10 million current US$ in 2019.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Timor-Leste?
- The lowest recorded value was 10,000 current US$ in 1974.
- How does Timor-Leste rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
- Timor-Leste ranks 45th out of 173 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Timor-Leste?
- Over the last ten years it is up 24.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Timor-Leste data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 29 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.