Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in IDA & IBRD total
IDA & IBRD total: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 1.62 current US$ per person in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in IDA & IBRD total, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per person.
Analysis
IDA & IBRD total recorded 1.62 current US$ per person for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 23.8% on the previous year and up 117.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in IDA & IBRD total peaked at 1.9 current US$ per person in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0.0941 current US$ per person, in 1970.
That places IDA & IBRD total 22nd out of 45 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in IDA & IBRD total, year by year
| Year | current US$ per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.0941 current US$ per person | — |
| 1971 | 0.1015 current US$ per person | +7.8% |
| 1972 | 0.1173 current US$ per person | +15.6% |
| 1973 | 0.1921 current US$ per person | +63.8% |
| 1974 | 0.2201 current US$ per person | +14.6% |
| 1975 | 0.2344 current US$ per person | +6.5% |
| 1976 | 0.2212 current US$ per person | -5.6% |
| 1977 | 0.2396 current US$ per person | +8.3% |
| 1978 | 0.4216 current US$ per person | +76.0% |
| 1979 | 0.5275 current US$ per person | +25.1% |
| 1980 | 0.5202 current US$ per person | -1.4% |
| 1981 | 0.5199 current US$ per person | -0.1% |
| 1982 | 0.6059 current US$ per person | +16.5% |
| 1983 | 0.6061 current US$ per person | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.5942 current US$ per person | -2.0% |
| 1985 | 0.6114 current US$ per person | +2.9% |
| 1986 | 0.8942 current US$ per person | +46.3% |
| 1987 | 1.2 current US$ per person | +33.8% |
| 1988 | 1.42 current US$ per person | +18.4% |
| 1989 | 1.45 current US$ per person | +2.6% |
| 1990 | 1.45 current US$ per person | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 1.83 current US$ per person | +25.8% |
| 1992 | 1.71 current US$ per person | -6.6% |
| 1993 | 1.58 current US$ per person | -7.5% |
| 1994 | 1.83 current US$ per person | +15.9% |
| 1995 | 1.9 current US$ per person | +3.7% |
| 1996 | 1.48 current US$ per person | -22.2% |
| 1997 | 1.1 current US$ per person | -25.5% |
| 1998 | 1.5 current US$ per person | +36.1% |
| 1999 | 1.82 current US$ per person | +21.3% |
| 2000 | 1.57 current US$ per person | -13.4% |
| 2001 | 1.22 current US$ per person | -22.6% |
| 2002 | 1.07 current US$ per person | -12.0% |
| 2003 | 0.9828 current US$ per person | -8.3% |
| 2004 | 0.8651 current US$ per person | -12.0% |
| 2005 | 1.66 current US$ per person | +91.8% |
| 2006 | 1.07 current US$ per person | -35.7% |
| 2007 | 0.8115 current US$ per person | -24.0% |
| 2008 | 0.8036 current US$ per person | -1.0% |
| 2009 | 0.7548 current US$ per person | -6.1% |
| 2010 | 0.9412 current US$ per person | +24.7% |
| 2011 | 0.7912 current US$ per person | -15.9% |
| 2012 | 0.7438 current US$ per person | -6.0% |
| 2013 | 1.11 current US$ per person | +48.8% |
| 2014 | 0.6498 current US$ per person | -41.3% |
| 2015 | 0.6246 current US$ per person | -3.9% |
| 2016 | 0.7038 current US$ per person | +12.7% |
| 2017 | 0.8046 current US$ per person | +14.3% |
| 2018 | 0.5771 current US$ per person | -28.3% |
| 2019 | 0.7881 current US$ per person | +36.6% |
| 2020 | 1.12 current US$ per person | +42.1% |
| 2021 | 1.31 current US$ per person | +16.6% |
| 2022 | 1.62 current US$ per person | +23.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.2369 current US$ per person | 0.0941 current US$ per person | 0.5275 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.8416 current US$ per person | 0.5199 current US$ per person | 1.45 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.62 current US$ per person | 1.1 current US$ per person | 1.9 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.08 current US$ per person | 0.7548 current US$ per person | 1.66 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.7731 current US$ per person | 0.5771 current US$ per person | 1.11 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.35 current US$ per person | 1.12 current US$ per person | 1.62 current US$ per person | 3 |
Countries ranked near IDA & IBRD total
- 19 Vanuatu 21.14 current US$ per person compare
- 20 Antigua and Barbuda 20.19 current US$ per person compare
- 21 Cambodia 20.14 current US$ per person compare
- 22 Timor-Leste 19.95 current US$ per person compare
- 23 Samoa 19.42 current US$ per person compare
- 24 Palestine, State of 17.98 current US$ per person compare
- 25 Brunei Darussalam 13.91 current US$ per person compare
More aid effectiveness data for IDA & IBRD total
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 442.92 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 597.18 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 4.38 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 19.57 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.54 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 11.58 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 6.85 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.80 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.27 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 10.98 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in IDA & IBRD total?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in IDA & IBRD total was 1.62 current US$ per person in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in IDA & IBRD total?
- The highest recorded value was 1.9 current US$ per person in 1995.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in IDA & IBRD total?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0941 current US$ per person in 1970.
- How does IDA & IBRD total rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- IDA & IBRD total ranks 22nd out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in IDA & IBRD total?
- Over the last ten years it is up 117.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this IDA & IBRD total data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.