Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Brazil
Brazil: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 18.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Brazil, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Brazil stood at 18.49 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1,636.8% on the previous year and up 1,176.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Brazil peaked at 29.55 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, -30.35 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2012.
Brazil ranks 113th of 171 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Brazil, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | -0.2824 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | -0.256 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 1963 | 1.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -810.3% |
| 1964 | -0.2728 current US$ per square kilometre | -115.0% |
| 1965 | 3.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -1343.9% |
| 1966 | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.1% |
| 1967 | -0.7298 current US$ per square kilometre | -146.9% |
| 1968 | -0.8447 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 1969 | -1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 1970 | -1.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.6% |
| 1971 | -1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1972 | -1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1973 | -0.6772 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.2% |
| 1974 | 0.2297 current US$ per square kilometre | -133.9% |
| 1975 | 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +1101.0% |
| 1976 | 2.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.6% |
| 1977 | 3.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.5% |
| 1978 | 4.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 1979 | 3.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.2% |
| 1980 | 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 1981 | 3.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.0% |
| 1982 | 6.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.9% |
| 1983 | 3.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.2% |
| 1984 | 4.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 1985 | 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 1986 | 3.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.5% |
| 1987 | 9.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +154.3% |
| 1988 | 7.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.2% |
| 1989 | 14.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.1% |
| 1990 | 7.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.9% |
| 1991 | 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.1% |
| 1992 | 7.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.0% |
| 1993 | 9.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.3% |
| 1994 | 10.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1995 | 12.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1996 | 7.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.8% |
| 1997 | 7.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1998 | 12.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.1% |
| 1999 | 17.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.9% |
| 2000 | 20.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2001 | 12.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.4% |
| 2002 | 14.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 2003 | 11.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.6% |
| 2004 | 4.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.8% |
| 2005 | 3.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 2006 | -1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -142.5% |
| 2007 | -1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.1% |
| 2008 | 11.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -1041.3% |
| 2009 | -11.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -199.9% |
| 2010 | -7.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.8% |
| 2011 | 18.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -350.9% |
| 2012 | -30.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -261.3% |
| 2013 | -1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.3% |
| 2014 | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -207.2% |
| 2015 | 0.4391 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.1% |
| 2016 | -1.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -485.6% |
| 2017 | -4.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +169.9% |
| 2018 | -1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.8% |
| 2019 | -3.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +121.1% |
| 2020 | 8.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -351.9% |
| 2021 | 29.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +239.6% |
| 2022 | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -96.4% |
| 2023 | 18.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +1636.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3662 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 6.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 9.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 6.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 20.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | -2.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 14.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 110 Tanzania, United Republic of 19.12 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 111 Suriname 18.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 112 Estonia 18.64 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 114 Mauritania 18.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 115 Kuwait 17.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 116 Sudan 14.71 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Brazil
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 938,500 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 122.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 8.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 100.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 31.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 14.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 154.53 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Brazil?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Brazil was 18.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 29.55 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was -30.35 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- How does Brazil rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- Brazil ranks 113th out of 171 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,176.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.