Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Croatia
Croatia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 33.59 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Croatia, 1995–2010
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2010, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Croatia stood at 33.59 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 384.8% on the previous year and up 8.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Croatia peaked at 57.95 current US$ per square kilometre in 2001 and was at its lowest, -15.9 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1997.
That places Croatia 101st out of 171 countries with data for 2010, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Croatia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 7.69 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1996 | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.1% |
| 1997 | -15.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -841.7% |
| 1998 | 14.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -192.3% |
| 1999 | 8.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.2% |
| 2000 | 30.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +253.0% |
| 2001 | 57.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.3% |
| 2002 | 9.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.3% |
| 2003 | 17.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +95.9% |
| 2004 | 12.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.0% |
| 2005 | 8.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.4% |
| 2006 | -1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -112.5% |
| 2007 | 3.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -416.7% |
| 2008 | 0.1787 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.7% |
| 2009 | -11.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -6700.0% |
| 2010 | 33.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -384.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 2000s | 12.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 57.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 33.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 33.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 33.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
Countries ranked near Croatia
- 98 United Arab Emirates 35.62 current US$ per square kilometre
- 99 Zambia 34.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 100 Dominica 34.21 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 102 Zimbabwe 33.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 103 Belize 32.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 104 Cyprus 31.39 current US$ per square kilometre
More aid effectiveness data for Croatia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.74 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 110,000 current US$ (2009)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 105.39 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.53 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.77 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.05 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -1.61 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.88 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Croatia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Croatia was 33.59 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Croatia?
- The highest recorded value was 57.95 current US$ per square kilometre in 2001.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Croatia?
- The lowest recorded value was -15.9 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997.
- How does Croatia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- Croatia ranks 101st out of 171 countries with data for 2010.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in Croatia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Croatia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.