Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 79.11 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) stood at 79.11 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 48.9% on the previous year and up 1,119.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 339.87 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999 and was at its lowest, -74.82 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2018.
That places East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) 23rd out of 45 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 11.82 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 13.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 1972 | 18.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.2% |
| 1973 | 25.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.0% |
| 1974 | 29.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 1975 | 26.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 1976 | 27.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1977 | 18.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.1% |
| 1978 | 37.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +97.1% |
| 1979 | 50.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.9% |
| 1980 | 55.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1981 | 60.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1982 | 74.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 1983 | 76.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1984 | 82.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 1985 | 86.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1986 | 106.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 1987 | 155.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.7% |
| 1988 | 186.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 1989 | 198.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1990 | 202.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1991 | 187.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 1992 | 290.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.9% |
| 1993 | 250.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 1994 | 245.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1995 | 266.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1996 | 190.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 1997 | 140.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.2% |
| 1998 | 242.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.2% |
| 1999 | 339.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.4% |
| 2000 | 262.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.7% |
| 2001 | 188.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.4% |
| 2002 | 173.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 2003 | 149.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 2004 | 124.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.8% |
| 2005 | 202.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.6% |
| 2006 | 87.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.7% |
| 2007 | 74.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.2% |
| 2008 | -0.0826 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.1% |
| 2009 | 76.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -92903.0% |
| 2010 | 60.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.9% |
| 2011 | -13.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -121.6% |
| 2012 | -7.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.6% |
| 2013 | 125.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -1716.1% |
| 2014 | 9.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -92.5% |
| 2015 | 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.5% |
| 2016 | -7.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -383.2% |
| 2017 | 7.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -204.5% |
| 2018 | -74.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -1118.4% |
| 2019 | -22.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.3% |
| 2020 | 104.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -553.4% |
| 2021 | 53.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.9% |
| 2022 | 79.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 26.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 50.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 108.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 198.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 235.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 140.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 339.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 133.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0826 current US$ per square kilometre | 262.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 125.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 78.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 53.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 104.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 20 Panama 2,617 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 Iraq 2,251 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Comoros 2,182 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 El Salvador 2,000 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Cambodia 1,988 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Timor-Leste 1,857 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Djibouti 1,857 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 24.48 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 12.89 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 78.05 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 507.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 114.85 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.36 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 35.33 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 139.25 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -13.95 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.26 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) was 79.11 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 339.87 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was -74.82 current US$ per square kilometre in 2018.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 23rd out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,119.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.