Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Ecuador
Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 725.72 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
725.72 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 337.7%
World rank
44th
of 171 countries
All-time high
725.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
-47.35 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2009
Years of data
62
1962–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Ecuador, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Ecuador is 725.72 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 62 years on record.
That represents a change of up 337.7% on the previous year and up 2,029.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Ecuador peaked at 725.72 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, -47.35 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2009.
That places Ecuador 44th out of 171 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 0.1445 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.1084 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0722 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1965 | 0.0722 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.2167 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1967 | 0.1084 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1968 | 0.3973 current US$ per square kilometre | +266.7% |
| 1969 | 0.1445 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.6% |
| 1970 | 0.1806 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1971 | 0.8308 current US$ per square kilometre | +360.0% |
| 1972 | 0.3251 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.9% |
| 1973 | 0.4335 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1974 | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +375.0% |
| 1975 | 15.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +645.6% |
| 1976 | 15.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1977 | 5.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.2% |
| 1978 | 25.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +397.9% |
| 1979 | 101.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +294.7% |
| 1980 | 16.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.7% |
| 1981 | 6.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.9% |
| 1982 | 12.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.7% |
| 1983 | 9.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.3% |
| 1984 | 7.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.3% |
| 1985 | 6.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1986 | 10.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.1% |
| 1987 | 166.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +1477.4% |
| 1988 | 58.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.0% |
| 1989 | 88.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.2% |
| 1990 | 54.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.2% |
| 1991 | 25.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.7% |
| 1992 | 94.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +268.1% |
| 1993 | 85.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 1994 | 119.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.9% |
| 1995 | 133.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1996 | 171.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 1997 | 92.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.1% |
| 1998 | 198.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +115.3% |
| 1999 | 101.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.7% |
| 2000 | 81.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.5% |
| 2001 | 66.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.8% |
| 2002 | 113.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.0% |
| 2003 | 29.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.1% |
| 2004 | -10.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -136.6% |
| 2005 | 24.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -330.2% |
| 2006 | 18.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.4% |
| 2007 | 11.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.6% |
| 2008 | -23.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -292.9% |
| 2009 | -47.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +105.2% |
| 2010 | -21.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.5% |
| 2011 | -40.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.4% |
| 2012 | -37.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 2013 | -37.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2014 | -31.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 2015 | 13.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -143.0% |
| 2016 | 40.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +198.8% |
| 2017 | 11.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.0% |
| 2018 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.4% |
| 2019 | 57.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +3782.5% |
| 2020 | 5.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.9% |
| 2021 | 48.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +740.3% |
| 2022 | 165.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +241.3% |
| 2023 | 725.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +337.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.158 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0722 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3973 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 16.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1806 current US$ per square kilometre | 101.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 38.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 166.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 107.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 198.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 26.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 113.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | -4.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 57.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 236.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 725.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 41 Solomon Islands 796.46 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Burundi 781.78 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Brunei Darussalam 768.5 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Myanmar 620.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 46 Saint Kitts and Nevis 576.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 47 Malta 562.5 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Ecuador
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 909,618 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 4.52 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.97 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 30.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 28.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 596,171 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 180.24 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Ecuador?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Ecuador was 725.72 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 725.72 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -47.35 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009.
- How does Ecuador rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- Ecuador ranks 44th out of 171 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2,029.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.