Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean
Latin America & Caribbean: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 33.18 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
33.18 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 1.4%
Rank
38th
of 45 groups
All-time high
56.74 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1995
All-time low
-18.06 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean stood at 33.18 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 1.4% on the previous year and up 1,795.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean peaked at 56.74 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995 and was at its lowest, -18.06 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2017.
Latin America & Caribbean ranks 38th of 45 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.1664 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | -0.3029 current US$ per square kilometre | -282.0% |
| 1963 | 0.4309 current US$ per square kilometre | -242.3% |
| 1964 | -0.5733 current US$ per square kilometre | -233.1% |
| 1965 | 0.9838 current US$ per square kilometre | -271.6% |
| 1966 | 0.8667 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 1967 | -0.0085 current US$ per square kilometre | -101.0% |
| 1968 | -0.4269 current US$ per square kilometre | +4941.2% |
| 1969 | -0.6545 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.3% |
| 1970 | -0.7477 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1971 | -0.5569 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.5% |
| 1972 | -0.1355 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.7% |
| 1973 | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -1395.6% |
| 1974 | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 1975 | 2.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 1976 | 2.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1977 | 3.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.1% |
| 1978 | 6.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.0% |
| 1979 | 8.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 1980 | 5.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 1981 | 8.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.1% |
| 1982 | 9.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1983 | 11.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.5% |
| 1984 | 11.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1985 | 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1986 | 15.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.0% |
| 1987 | 20.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.1% |
| 1988 | 19.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1989 | 27.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.7% |
| 1990 | 27.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1991 | 42.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.6% |
| 1992 | 38.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 1993 | 36.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1994 | 41.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1995 | 56.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.7% |
| 1996 | 49 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 1997 | 35.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.4% |
| 1998 | 27.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.6% |
| 1999 | 40.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.2% |
| 2000 | 39.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2001 | 36.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 2002 | 29.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 2003 | 23 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.0% |
| 2004 | 15.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 2005 | 20.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.7% |
| 2006 | 21.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2007 | 10.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.8% |
| 2008 | 12.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 2009 | 6.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.6% |
| 2010 | -17.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -372.4% |
| 2011 | 16.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -193.9% |
| 2012 | -10.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -160.2% |
| 2013 | -1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.6% |
| 2014 | 0.3253 current US$ per square kilometre | -116.6% |
| 2015 | -1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -551.5% |
| 2016 | 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -310.8% |
| 2017 | -18.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -683.3% |
| 2018 | 8.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -148.9% |
| 2019 | 7.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.2% |
| 2020 | 18.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +151.7% |
| 2021 | 22.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 2022 | 33.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.3% |
| 2023 | 33.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0535 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6545 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9838 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7477 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 14.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 39.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 56.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 21.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | -1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 26.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 33.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean
- 35 Tunisia 1,047 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Jordan 1,026 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 India 972.71 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Rwanda 898.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Lebanon 838.46 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Cape Verde 819.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Solomon Islands 796.46 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean was 33.18 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The highest recorded value was 56.74 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The lowest recorded value was -18.06 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- Latin America & Caribbean ranks 38th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,795.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.