Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 181.58 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) recorded 181.58 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in 2023.
That represents a change of up 44.2% on the previous year and up 9.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) peaked at 359.44 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0.0209 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 13th of 45 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0288 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0209 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.6% |
| 1963 | 0.0258 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 1964 | 0.0298 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 1965 | 0.0238 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0278 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1967 | 0.0397 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.9% |
| 1968 | 0.0606 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.5% |
| 1969 | 0.295 current US$ per square kilometre | +386.9% |
| 1970 | 5.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +1679.1% |
| 1971 | 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.7% |
| 1972 | 0.8463 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.6% |
| 1973 | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +104.6% |
| 1974 | 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +117.7% |
| 1975 | 10.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +173.7% |
| 1976 | 6.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.0% |
| 1977 | 23.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +280.4% |
| 1978 | 36.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.0% |
| 1979 | 34.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 1980 | 29.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 1981 | 24.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 1982 | 25.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1983 | 22.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 1984 | 25.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1985 | 24.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1986 | 38.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.3% |
| 1987 | 41.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1988 | 68.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.7% |
| 1989 | 43.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 1990 | 53.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 1991 | 145.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +171.4% |
| 1992 | 49.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.2% |
| 1993 | 68.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.8% |
| 1994 | 100.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.7% |
| 1995 | 92.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1996 | 83.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1997 | 63.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.8% |
| 1998 | 92.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.0% |
| 1999 | 76.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.4% |
| 2000 | 87.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 2001 | 56.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.5% |
| 2002 | 52.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2003 | 68.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.8% |
| 2004 | 118.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.9% |
| 2005 | 359.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +202.8% |
| 2006 | 120.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.4% |
| 2007 | 91.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.4% |
| 2008 | 210.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +130.5% |
| 2009 | 60.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.2% |
| 2010 | 128.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +111.5% |
| 2011 | 158.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.4% |
| 2012 | 173.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2013 | 165.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 2014 | 115.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.0% |
| 2015 | 104.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 2016 | 155.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.2% |
| 2017 | 104.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.8% |
| 2018 | 86.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 2019 | 77.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 2020 | 130.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.7% |
| 2021 | 133.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2022 | 125.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2023 | 181.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.2% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970 | +1679.1% | 0.295 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.25 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1969 | +386.9% | 0.0606 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.295 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0614 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0209 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.295 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 12.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8463 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 34.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 68.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 82.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 49.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 145.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 122.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 52.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 359.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 126.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 77.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 173.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 142.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 125.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 181.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
- 10 Bangladesh 14,226 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Seychelles 11,927 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Macau, China 10,500 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Saint Lucia 6,639 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Micronesia, Federated States of 5,687 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Hong Kong, China 5,581 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Antigua and Barbuda 4,239 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 76.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 92.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 582.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.51 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 387.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.31 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.27 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 708.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 256.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.83 billion current US$ (2023)
All data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) was 181.58 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 359.44 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0209 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 13th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.