Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 144.48 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
144.48 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 44.2%
Rank
15th
of 45 groups
All-time high
286.06 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
All-time low
0.0182 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1962
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan recorded 144.48 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in 2023.
That represents a change of up 44.2% on the previous year and up 9.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan peaked at 286.06 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0.0182 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
That places Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan 15th out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0229 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0182 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.7% |
| 1963 | 0.0213 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 1964 | 0.0253 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 1965 | 0.0206 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 1966 | 0.0237 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 1967 | 0.0332 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0498 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1969 | 0.2372 current US$ per square kilometre | +376.2% |
| 1970 | 4.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +1661.3% |
| 1971 | 3.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.7% |
| 1972 | 0.6735 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.6% |
| 1973 | 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +104.6% |
| 1974 | 3 current US$ per square kilometre | +117.7% |
| 1975 | 8.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +173.7% |
| 1976 | 5.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.0% |
| 1977 | 19.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +280.4% |
| 1978 | 28.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.0% |
| 1979 | 27.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 1980 | 23.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 1981 | 19.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 1982 | 19.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1983 | 17.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 1984 | 19.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1985 | 19.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1986 | 30.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.3% |
| 1987 | 32.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1988 | 54.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.7% |
| 1989 | 34.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 1990 | 42.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 1991 | 116.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +171.4% |
| 1992 | 39.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.2% |
| 1993 | 54.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.8% |
| 1994 | 79.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.7% |
| 1995 | 73.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1996 | 66.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1997 | 50.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.8% |
| 1998 | 73.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.0% |
| 1999 | 60.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.4% |
| 2000 | 69.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 2001 | 44.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.5% |
| 2002 | 41.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2003 | 54.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.8% |
| 2004 | 94.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.9% |
| 2005 | 286.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +202.8% |
| 2006 | 96.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.4% |
| 2007 | 72.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.4% |
| 2008 | 167.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +130.5% |
| 2009 | 48.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.2% |
| 2010 | 102.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +111.5% |
| 2011 | 126 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.4% |
| 2012 | 137.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2013 | 131.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 2014 | 92.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.0% |
| 2015 | 82.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 2016 | 123.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.2% |
| 2017 | 83.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.8% |
| 2018 | 68.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 2019 | 61.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 2020 | 104 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.7% |
| 2021 | 106.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2022 | 100.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2023 | 144.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0502 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0182 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2372 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 10.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6735 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 27.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 54.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 65.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 116.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 97.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 41.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 286.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 100.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 137.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 113.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 100.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 144.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
- 12 Macau, China 10,500 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Saint Lucia 6,639 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Micronesia, Federated States of 5,687 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Hong Kong, China 5,581 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Antigua and Barbuda 4,239 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Republic of Moldova 3,948 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Philippines 3,359 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 76.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 92.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 582.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.51 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 387.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.31 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.27 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 708.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 256.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.83 billion current US$ (2023)
All data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan was 144.48 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 286.06 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0182 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 15th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.