Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in South Asia
South Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 1,481 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
1,481 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 10.2%
Rank
3rd
of 45 groups
All-time high
1,648 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
All-time low
3.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1962
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in South Asia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in South Asia stood at 1,481 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 10.2% on the previous year and up 328.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in South Asia peaked at 1,648 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
South Asia ranks 3rd of 45 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in South Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 7.06 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.5% |
| 1963 | 13.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +328.3% |
| 1964 | 15.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 1965 | 25.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.7% |
| 1966 | 23.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 1967 | 20.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1968 | 37.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.9% |
| 1969 | 18.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.4% |
| 1970 | 10.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.5% |
| 1971 | 12.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1972 | 14.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 1973 | 30.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +107.5% |
| 1974 | 29.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1975 | 34.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 1976 | 37.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1977 | 35.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1978 | 64.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.7% |
| 1979 | 92.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.5% |
| 1980 | 96.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1981 | 69.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 1982 | 105.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.4% |
| 1983 | 100.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1984 | 71.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.5% |
| 1985 | 83.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 1986 | 202.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +141.5% |
| 1987 | 251.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.0% |
| 1988 | 240.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1989 | 272.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1990 | 209.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.8% |
| 1991 | 421.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.9% |
| 1992 | 242.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.4% |
| 1993 | 229.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 1994 | 444 current US$ per square kilometre | +93.4% |
| 1995 | 356.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.8% |
| 1996 | 309.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 1997 | 259.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 1998 | 289.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1999 | 297.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2000 | 253.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 2001 | 282.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2002 | 255.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2003 | 207.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 2004 | 62.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.2% |
| 2005 | 145.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +134.8% |
| 2006 | 87.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.1% |
| 2007 | 62.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 2008 | 239.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +284.9% |
| 2009 | 212.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 2010 | 395.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +86.1% |
| 2011 | 345.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 2012 | 386.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2013 | 345.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2014 | 365.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2015 | 403.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2016 | 465.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 2017 | 905.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.4% |
| 2018 | 804.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 2019 | 937.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 2020 | 882.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 2021 | 1,330 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.7% |
| 2022 | 1,648 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.9% |
| 2023 | 1,481 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 37.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 36.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 92.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 149.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 69.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 272.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 306.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 209.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 444 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 180.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 62.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 282.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 535.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 345.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 937.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1,336 current US$ per square kilometre | 882.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,648 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near South Asia
- 1 Naoero 554,375 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 2 Marshall Islands 64,246 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 3 Maldives 39,299 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Kiribati 27,760 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Singapore 20,194 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Palau 20,119 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for South Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 21.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.34 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 155.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 378.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 89.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 696.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 274.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 190.51 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 25.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.96 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in South Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in South Asia was 1,481 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in South Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 1,648 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in South Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does South Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- South Asia ranks 3rd out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in South Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 328.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.