Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Turkey
Turkey: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 41.15 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
41.15 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 90.1%
World rank
97th
of 171 countries
All-time high
706.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
All-time low
-162.83 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Turkey, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Turkey recorded 41.15 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in 2023.
That represents a change of down 90.1% on the previous year and up 406.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Turkey peaked at 706.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, -162.83 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2020.
That places Turkey 97th out of 171 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Turkey, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.039 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.039 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.052 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1964 | 0.039 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1965 | 0.1299 current US$ per square kilometre | +233.3% |
| 1966 | 0.1299 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.1299 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.1299 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.2209 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.0% |
| 1970 | 0.2079 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 1971 | 0.2339 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1972 | 1.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +588.9% |
| 1973 | 9.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +500.0% |
| 1974 | 12.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.5% |
| 1975 | 6.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.3% |
| 1976 | 16.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +163.9% |
| 1977 | 7.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.9% |
| 1978 | 6.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 1979 | 5.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.2% |
| 1980 | 6.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.3% |
| 1981 | 66.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +857.5% |
| 1982 | 35.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.9% |
| 1983 | 33.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1984 | 47.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.8% |
| 1985 | 33.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.5% |
| 1986 | 92.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +173.3% |
| 1987 | 211 current US$ per square kilometre | +128.2% |
| 1988 | 174.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 1989 | 86.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.7% |
| 1990 | 421.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +388.9% |
| 1991 | 551.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 1992 | 27.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -95.0% |
| 1993 | 16.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.7% |
| 1994 | 11.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.5% |
| 1995 | 43.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +270.4% |
| 1996 | 3.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -92.0% |
| 1997 | -28.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -906.3% |
| 1998 | -39.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1999 | -59.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.2% |
| 2000 | 187.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -416.9% |
| 2001 | -83.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -144.7% |
| 2002 | -20.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.4% |
| 2003 | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -106.3% |
| 2004 | -33.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -2693.0% |
| 2005 | -80.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +140.1% |
| 2006 | 80.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -200.0% |
| 2007 | 112.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.0% |
| 2008 | 371.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +230.4% |
| 2009 | 273.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 2010 | 706.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +157.9% |
| 2011 | 36.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.9% |
| 2012 | 43.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.5% |
| 2013 | -13.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -130.8% |
| 2014 | 37.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -378.4% |
| 2015 | -94.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -352.9% |
| 2016 | -98.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2017 | -36.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.1% |
| 2018 | -84.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +132.1% |
| 2019 | -109.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.4% |
| 2020 | -162.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.3% |
| 2021 | -54.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 2022 | 417.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -868.5% |
| 2023 | 41.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -90.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1011 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.039 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2209 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 6.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2079 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 78.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 211 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 94.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 551.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 80.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 371.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 38.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -109.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 706.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 60.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -162.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 417.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Turkey
- 94 Lithuania 50.41 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 95 Yemen 44.59 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 96 Somalia 41.81 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 98 United Arab Emirates 35.62 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 99 Zambia 34.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 100 Dominica 34.21 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Turkey
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 35.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 8.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 22.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 633.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 7.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 38.30 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 30.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 42.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 33.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 31.67 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Turkey?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Turkey was 41.15 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Turkey?
- The highest recorded value was 706.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Turkey?
- The lowest recorded value was -162.83 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020.
- How does Turkey rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- Turkey ranks 97th out of 171 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in Turkey?
- Over the last ten years it is up 406.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Turkey data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.