Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Lithuania

Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2004. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2004)
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP
Change on year
up 4.1%
World rank
103rd
of 171 countries
All-time high
0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2000
All-time low
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 1995
Years of data
10
1995–2004

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Lithuania, 1995–2004

00001995199920041995: 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP1996: 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP1997: 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP1998: 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP1999: 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP2000: 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP2001: 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP2002: 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP2003: 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP2004: 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per US$ of GDP.

Analysis

Lithuania recorded 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in 2004.

The figure is up 4.1% on the previous year and up 587.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Lithuania peaked at 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, in 1995.

That places Lithuania 103rd out of 171 countries with data for 2004, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Lithuania, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per unit of GDP in Lithuania, 1995 to 2004.
Year current US$ per US$ of GDP Change
1995 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
1996 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP +70.3%
1997 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP -22.8%
1998 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP +303.7%
1999 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP +43.1%
2000 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP +13.5%
2001 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP -16.1%
2002 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP -29.0%
2003 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP +28.8%
2004 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP +4.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 5
2000s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 5

Countries ranked near Lithuania

  1. 100 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
  2. 101 Montenegro 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP
  3. 102 Singapore 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP
  4. 104 Libya 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
  5. 105 Guyana 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
  6. 106 Grenada 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare

See the full ranking of 218 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Lithuania

All data for Lithuania →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Lithuania?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Lithuania was 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Lithuania?
The highest recorded value was 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2000.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Lithuania?
The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1995.
How does Lithuania rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Lithuania ranks 103rd out of 171 countries with data for 2004.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in Lithuania?
Over the last ten years it is up 587.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Lithuania data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Lithuania. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/lithuania/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Lithuania</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ GDP (current US$)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,844 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.