Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan was 1.19 billion current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), 1970–2022
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) recorded 1.19 billion current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan in 2022.
The figure is up 27.8% on the previous year and up 145.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) peaked at 3.46 billion current US$ in 2005 and was at its lowest, -20,000 current US$, in 1972.
That places Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) 27th out of 47 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 12.39 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 3.98 million current US$ | -67.9% |
| 1972 | -20,000 current US$ | -100.5% |
| 1973 | 1.54 million current US$ | -7800.0% |
| 1974 | 11.19 million current US$ | +626.6% |
| 1975 | 83.66 million current US$ | +647.6% |
| 1976 | 42.98 million current US$ | -48.6% |
| 1977 | 203.98 million current US$ | +374.6% |
| 1978 | 311.44 million current US$ | +52.7% |
| 1979 | 159.11 million current US$ | -48.9% |
| 1980 | 178.34 million current US$ | +12.1% |
| 1981 | 120.63 million current US$ | -32.4% |
| 1982 | 124.83 million current US$ | +3.5% |
| 1983 | 115.27 million current US$ | -7.7% |
| 1984 | 160.44 million current US$ | +39.2% |
| 1985 | 133.62 million current US$ | -16.7% |
| 1986 | 219.03 million current US$ | +63.9% |
| 1987 | 280.09 million current US$ | +27.9% |
| 1988 | 377.34 million current US$ | +34.7% |
| 1989 | 246.63 million current US$ | -34.6% |
| 1990 | 332.30 million current US$ | +34.7% |
| 1991 | 1.32 billion current US$ | +298.3% |
| 1992 | 271.63 million current US$ | -79.5% |
| 1993 | 474.32 million current US$ | +74.6% |
| 1994 | 715.71 million current US$ | +50.9% |
| 1995 | 664.18 million current US$ | -7.2% |
| 1996 | 506.32 million current US$ | -23.8% |
| 1997 | 488.78 million current US$ | -3.5% |
| 1998 | 374.10 million current US$ | -23.5% |
| 1999 | 518.03 million current US$ | +38.5% |
| 2000 | 507.61 million current US$ | -2.0% |
| 2001 | 311.76 million current US$ | -38.6% |
| 2002 | 169.68 million current US$ | -45.6% |
| 2003 | 274.65 million current US$ | +61.9% |
| 2004 | 873.76 million current US$ | +218.1% |
| 2005 | 3.46 billion current US$ | +295.7% |
| 2006 | 794.65 million current US$ | -77.0% |
| 2007 | 867.92 million current US$ | +9.2% |
| 2008 | 1.84 billion current US$ | +111.7% |
| 2009 | 63.85 million current US$ | -96.5% |
| 2010 | 254.50 million current US$ | +298.6% |
| 2011 | 234.34 million current US$ | -7.9% |
| 2012 | 486.70 million current US$ | +107.7% |
| 2013 | 641.57 million current US$ | +31.8% |
| 2014 | 486.02 million current US$ | -24.2% |
| 2015 | 540.39 million current US$ | +11.2% |
| 2016 | 883.12 million current US$ | +63.4% |
| 2017 | 764.17 million current US$ | -13.5% |
| 2018 | 712.73 million current US$ | -6.7% |
| 2019 | 696.70 million current US$ | -2.2% |
| 2020 | 1.09 billion current US$ | +56.4% |
| 2021 | 933.56 million current US$ | -14.3% |
| 2022 | 1.19 billion current US$ | +27.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 83.03 million current US$ | -20,000 current US$ | 311.44 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 195.62 million current US$ | 115.27 million current US$ | 377.34 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 566.88 million current US$ | 271.63 million current US$ | 1.32 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 915.83 million current US$ | 63.85 million current US$ | 3.46 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 570.02 million current US$ | 234.34 million current US$ | 883.12 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.07 billion current US$ | 933.56 million current US$ | 1.19 billion current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
- 24 Senegal 85.26 million current US$ compare
- 25 Ethiopia 84.05 million current US$ compare
- 26 Sri Lanka 76.61 million current US$ compare
- 27 Syrian Arab Republic 67.51 million current US$ compare
- 28 Nepal 65.44 million current US$ compare
- 29 Bhutan 60.91 million current US$ compare
- 30 Uganda 56.93 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 56.11 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 48.83 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 308.32 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.21 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 181.66 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.89 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.22 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 305.30 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 256.90 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway 213.19 million current US$ (2022)
All data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) was 1.19 billion current US$ in 2022, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- The highest recorded value was 3.46 billion current US$ in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- The lowest recorded value was -20,000 current US$ in 1972.
- How does Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 27th out of 47 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan rising or falling in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 145.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.