Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Central Europe and the Baltics
Central Europe and the Baltics: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was -9.33 % change on previous year in 2010. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Central Europe and the Baltics, 1991–2010
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2010, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Central Europe and the Baltics stood at -9.33 % change on previous year.
That represents a change of up 87.4% on the previous year and up 89.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Central Europe and the Baltics peaked at 728.57 % change on previous year in 1991 and was at its lowest, -227.32 % change on previous year, in 1998.
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 35th of 46 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Central Europe and the Baltics, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 728.57 % change on previous year | — |
| 1992 | 24.14 % change on previous year | -96.7% |
| 1994 | -60.55 % change on previous year | -350.8% |
| 1995 | 41.09 % change on previous year | -167.9% |
| 1996 | -54.8 % change on previous year | -233.4% |
| 1997 | 62.77 % change on previous year | -214.5% |
| 1998 | -227.32 % change on previous year | -462.2% |
| 1999 | 149.64 % change on previous year | -165.8% |
| 2000 | -90.43 % change on previous year | -160.4% |
| 2002 | 122.56 % change on previous year | -235.5% |
| 2003 | -86.73 % change on previous year | -170.8% |
| 2004 | -127.92 % change on previous year | +47.5% |
| 2009 | -73.87 % change on previous year | -42.2% |
| 2010 | -9.33 % change on previous year | -87.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 82.94 % change on previous year | -227.32 % change on previous year | 728.57 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 2000s | -51.28 % change on previous year | -127.92 % change on previous year | 122.56 % change on previous year | 5 |
| 2010s | -9.33 % change on previous year | -9.33 % change on previous year | -9.33 % change on previous year | 1 |
Countries ranked near Central Europe and the Baltics
- 32 Bangladesh 131.55 % change on previous year compare
- 33 Guyana 126.3 % change on previous year compare
- 34 Syrian Arab Republic 122.65 % change on previous year compare
- 35 Indonesia 113.19 % change on previous year compare
- 36 Oman 111.11 % change on previous year compare
- 37 Estonia 100 % change on previous year compare
- 38 Solomon Islands 98.55 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Central Europe and the Baltics
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.74 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 110,000 current US$ (2009)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 105.39 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.53 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.77 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.05 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 280,000 current US$ (2011)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.88 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Central Europe and the Baltics was -9.33 % change on previous year in 2010, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The highest recorded value was 728.57 % change on previous year in 1991.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The lowest recorded value was -227.32 % change on previous year in 1998.
- How does Central Europe and the Baltics rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 35th out of 46 groups with data for 2010.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Over the last ten years it is up 89.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Central Europe and the Baltics data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.