Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Rwanda
Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 25.59 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Rwanda, 1991–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Rwanda recorded 25.59 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 9.8% on the previous year and up 104.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Rwanda peaked at 26.09 million current US$ in 2018 and was at its lowest, 20,000 current US$, in 2001.
That places Rwanda 22nd out of 155 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Rwanda, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 130,000 current US$ | — |
| 1992 | 70,000 current US$ | -46.2% |
| 1993 | 70,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 100,000 current US$ | +42.9% |
| 1995 | 100,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 150,000 current US$ | +50.0% |
| 1997 | 120,000 current US$ | -20.0% |
| 1998 | 90,000 current US$ | -25.0% |
| 1999 | 60,000 current US$ | -33.3% |
| 2000 | 30,000 current US$ | -50.0% |
| 2001 | 20,000 current US$ | -33.3% |
| 2002 | 80,000 current US$ | +300.0% |
| 2003 | 40,000 current US$ | -50.0% |
| 2004 | 60,000 current US$ | +50.0% |
| 2005 | 100,000 current US$ | +66.7% |
| 2006 | 340,000 current US$ | +240.0% |
| 2007 | 840,000 current US$ | +147.1% |
| 2008 | 1.35 million current US$ | +60.7% |
| 2009 | 2.31 million current US$ | +71.1% |
| 2010 | 6.86 million current US$ | +197.0% |
| 2011 | 5.82 million current US$ | -15.2% |
| 2012 | 7.11 million current US$ | +22.2% |
| 2013 | 12.48 million current US$ | +75.6% |
| 2014 | 16.46 million current US$ | +31.8% |
| 2015 | 20.93 million current US$ | +27.2% |
| 2016 | 18.27 million current US$ | -12.7% |
| 2017 | 16.52 million current US$ | -9.6% |
| 2018 | 26.09 million current US$ | +57.9% |
| 2019 | 21.53 million current US$ | -17.5% |
| 2020 | 12.93 million current US$ | -39.9% |
| 2021 | 25.97 million current US$ | +100.9% |
| 2022 | 23.30 million current US$ | -10.3% |
| 2023 | 25.59 million current US$ | +9.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 98,889 current US$ | 60,000 current US$ | 150,000 current US$ | 9 |
| 2000s | 517,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 2.31 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 15.21 million current US$ | 5.82 million current US$ | 26.09 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 21.95 million current US$ | 12.93 million current US$ | 25.97 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Rwanda
More aid effectiveness data for Rwanda
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 329,220 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 38.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 56.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 10.29 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 77.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 83.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 22.70 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 3.03 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 22.16 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Rwanda?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Rwanda was 25.59 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Rwanda?
- The highest recorded value was 26.09 million current US$ in 2018.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Rwanda?
- The lowest recorded value was 20,000 current US$ in 2001.
- How does Rwanda rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Rwanda ranks 22nd out of 155 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Rwanda?
- Over the last ten years it is up 104.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Rwanda data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 33 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.