Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 38.41 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Uzbekistan, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Uzbekistan stood at 38.41 million current US$.
The figure is up 6.1% on the previous year and up 258.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Uzbekistan peaked at 64.61 million current US$ in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$, in 1992.
Uzbekistan ranks 15th of 155 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 current US$ | — |
| 1993 | 0 current US$ | — |
| 1994 | 490,000 current US$ | — |
| 1995 | 490,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 980,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1997 | 1.07 million current US$ | +9.2% |
| 1998 | 690,000 current US$ | -35.5% |
| 1999 | 9.54 million current US$ | +1282.6% |
| 2000 | 18.49 million current US$ | +93.8% |
| 2001 | 16.27 million current US$ | -12.0% |
| 2002 | 2.94 million current US$ | -81.9% |
| 2003 | 1.66 million current US$ | -43.5% |
| 2004 | 2.32 million current US$ | +39.8% |
| 2005 | 2.63 million current US$ | +13.4% |
| 2006 | 4.29 million current US$ | +63.1% |
| 2007 | 3.21 million current US$ | -25.2% |
| 2008 | 3.99 million current US$ | +24.3% |
| 2009 | 5.90 million current US$ | +47.9% |
| 2010 | 32.21 million current US$ | +445.9% |
| 2011 | 21.99 million current US$ | -31.7% |
| 2012 | 19.09 million current US$ | -13.2% |
| 2013 | 10.70 million current US$ | -43.9% |
| 2014 | 14.47 million current US$ | +35.1% |
| 2015 | 14.96 million current US$ | +3.4% |
| 2016 | 26.80 million current US$ | +79.2% |
| 2017 | 54.04 million current US$ | +101.6% |
| 2018 | 32.51 million current US$ | -39.8% |
| 2019 | 64.61 million current US$ | +98.8% |
| 2020 | 54.29 million current US$ | -16.0% |
| 2021 | 38.32 million current US$ | -29.4% |
| 2022 | 36.20 million current US$ | -5.5% |
| 2023 | 38.41 million current US$ | +6.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.66 million current US$ | 0 current US$ | 9.54 million current US$ | 8 |
| 2000s | 6.17 million current US$ | 1.66 million current US$ | 18.49 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 29.14 million current US$ | 10.70 million current US$ | 64.61 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 41.81 million current US$ | 36.20 million current US$ | 54.29 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
More aid effectiveness data for Uzbekistan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 5,038 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 82,995 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 18.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 11.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 25.30 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 98.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 887,887 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 238.66 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Uzbekistan?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Uzbekistan was 38.41 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was 64.61 million current US$ in 2019.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ in 1992.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Uzbekistan ranks 15th out of 155 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 258.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) with 352 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.