Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea … Korea Rep. square in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea … Korea Rep. square was 24.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) stood at 24.34 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 0.3% on the previous year and up 463.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) peaked at 24.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) 18th out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea … Korea Rep. square in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1985 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1986 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0.0376 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1989 | 0.0376 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.0376 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.1757 current US$ per square kilometre | +366.7% |
| 1992 | 0.0276 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.3% |
| 1993 | 0.0242 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1994 | 0.176 current US$ per square kilometre | +628.6% |
| 1995 | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +499.0% |
| 1996 | 1.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.3% |
| 1997 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.0% |
| 1998 | 0.2967 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.6% |
| 1999 | 4.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +1284.4% |
| 2000 | 3.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.7% |
| 2001 | 5.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.5% |
| 2002 | 5.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2003 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.7% |
| 2004 | 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.3% |
| 2005 | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 2006 | 6.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +265.2% |
| 2007 | 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.3% |
| 2008 | 4.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2009 | 9.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +120.7% |
| 2010 | 13.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.7% |
| 2011 | 9.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.0% |
| 2012 | 7.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 2013 | 4.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.4% |
| 2014 | 7.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +74.1% |
| 2015 | 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.6% |
| 2016 | 8.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +166.0% |
| 2017 | 13.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.0% |
| 2018 | 9.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 2019 | 17.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.9% |
| 2020 | 15.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 2021 | 11.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.5% |
| 2022 | 24.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +109.9% |
| 2023 | 24.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea … Korea Rep. square in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | +1284.4% | 0.2967 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.11 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1994 | +628.6% | 0.0242 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.176 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1995 | +499.0% | 0.176 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0075 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0376 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.8653 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0242 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 9.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 18.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- 15 Lebanon 454.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Maldives 442.21 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Saint Kitts and Nevis 399.81 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Fiji 362.6 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Philippines 355.91 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Tonga 351 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 Sao Tome and Principe 342.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
All data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) was 24.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 24.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 18th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 463.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.