Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 6.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2022)
6.23 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 110.9%
Rank
37th
of 46 groups
All-time high
6.23 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
All-time low
-0.7688 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1998
Years of data
35
1988–2022

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), 1988–2022

02461988200520221988: 0.021 current US$ per square kilometre1989: 0.007 current US$ per square kilometre1990: 0.069 current US$ per square kilometre1991: 0.485 current US$ per square kilometre1992: 0.036 current US$ per square kilometre1993: 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre1994: 0.788 current US$ per square kilometre1995: 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre1996: 0.926 current US$ per square kilometre1997: 0.541 current US$ per square kilometre1998: -0.769 current US$ per square kilometre1999: 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre2000: 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre2001: 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre2002: 2 current US$ per square kilometre2003: 0.478 current US$ per square kilometre2004: 0.679 current US$ per square kilometre2005: 0.46 current US$ per square kilometre2006: 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre2007: 1 current US$ per square kilometre2008: 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre2009: 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre2010: 3.5 current US$ per square kilometre2011: 2.5 current US$ per square kilometre2012: 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre2013: 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre2014: 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre2015: 0.851 current US$ per square kilometre2016: 2.2 current US$ per square kilometre2017: 3.5 current US$ per square kilometre2018: 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre2019: 4.5 current US$ per square kilometre2020: 3.9 current US$ per square kilometre2021: 3 current US$ per square kilometre2022: 6.2 current US$ per square kilometre

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) stood at 6.23 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 35 years on record.

The figure is up 110.9% on the previous year and up 248.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 6.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, -0.7688 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1998.

That places Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) 37th out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), 1988 to 2022.
Year current US$ per square kilometre Change
1988 0.0208 current US$ per square kilometre
1989 0.0069 current US$ per square kilometre -66.6%
1990 0.0693 current US$ per square kilometre +900.0%
1991 0.485 current US$ per square kilometre +599.9%
1992 0.0363 current US$ per square kilometre -92.5%
1993 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre +5087.6%
1994 0.7876 current US$ per square kilometre -58.1%
1995 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre +70.8%
1996 0.9258 current US$ per square kilometre -31.2%
1997 0.5411 current US$ per square kilometre -41.6%
1998 -0.7688 current US$ per square kilometre -242.1%
1999 1.61 current US$ per square kilometre -310.1%
2000 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre -34.9%
2001 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre +35.2%
2002 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre +39.0%
2003 0.4784 current US$ per square kilometre -75.8%
2004 0.6789 current US$ per square kilometre +41.9%
2005 0.46 current US$ per square kilometre -32.2%
2006 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre +269.9%
2007 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre -39.4%
2008 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre +6.8%
2009 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre +122.1%
2010 3.53 current US$ per square kilometre +44.2%
2011 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre -29.7%
2012 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre -27.9%
2013 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre -38.1%
2014 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre +74.3%
2015 0.8513 current US$ per square kilometre -55.9%
2016 2.21 current US$ per square kilometre +159.6%
2017 3.46 current US$ per square kilometre +56.6%
2018 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre -29.2%
2019 4.5 current US$ per square kilometre +83.8%
2020 3.88 current US$ per square kilometre -13.9%
2021 2.95 current US$ per square kilometre -23.8%
2022 6.23 current US$ per square kilometre +110.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1980s 0.0139 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0069 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0208 current US$ per square kilometre 2
1990s 0.6918 current US$ per square kilometre -0.7688 current US$ per square kilometre 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre 10
2000s 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre 0.46 current US$ per square kilometre 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre 10
2010s 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8513 current US$ per square kilometre 4.5 current US$ per square kilometre 10
2020s 4.35 current US$ per square kilometre 2.95 current US$ per square kilometre 6.23 current US$ per square kilometre 3

Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)

  1. 34 Uganda 139.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
  2. 35 Micronesia, Federated States of 135.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
  3. 36 Solomon Islands 127.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
  4. 37 Bahrain 123.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
  5. 38 Ghana 118.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
  6. 39 Haiti 102.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
  7. 40 Kyrgyzstan 99.32 current US$ per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 201 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)

All data for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) was 6.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
The highest recorded value was 6.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
The lowest recorded value was -0.7688 current US$ per square kilometre in 1998.
How does Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 37th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Over the last ten years it is up 248.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,273 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.