Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia
Europe & Central Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 5.24 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
5.24 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 0.3%
Rank
40th
of 46 groups
All-time high
5.26 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia stood at 5.24 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 0.3% on the previous year and up 463.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia peaked at 5.26 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Europe & Central Asia 40th out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1985 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1986 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0.0055 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1989 | 0.0055 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.0055 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.0256 current US$ per square kilometre | +366.7% |
| 1992 | 0.0059 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.9% |
| 1993 | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 1994 | 0.0375 current US$ per square kilometre | +628.7% |
| 1995 | 0.2245 current US$ per square kilometre | +499.1% |
| 1996 | 0.3711 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.3% |
| 1997 | 0.2147 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.1% |
| 1998 | 0.063 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.7% |
| 1999 | 0.8722 current US$ per square kilometre | +1284.0% |
| 2000 | 0.7445 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.6% |
| 2001 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.5% |
| 2002 | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2003 | 0.296 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.7% |
| 2004 | 0.4921 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.3% |
| 2005 | 0.3852 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 2006 | 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +270.2% |
| 2007 | 0.8793 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.3% |
| 2008 | 0.9384 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2009 | 2.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +120.7% |
| 2010 | 2.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.7% |
| 2011 | 2.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.0% |
| 2012 | 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 2013 | 0.9302 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.4% |
| 2014 | 1.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +74.0% |
| 2015 | 0.7188 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.6% |
| 2016 | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +166.0% |
| 2017 | 2.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.0% |
| 2018 | 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 2019 | 3.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.9% |
| 2020 | 3.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 2021 | 2.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.5% |
| 2022 | 5.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +109.9% |
| 2023 | 5.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0011 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0055 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1825 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8722 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.9607 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.296 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7188 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia
- 37 Bahrain 123.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Ghana 118.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Haiti 102.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Kyrgyzstan 99.32 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Indonesia 95.89 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Jamaica 91.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Ukraine 90.83 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia was 5.24 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 5.26 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Europe & Central Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Europe & Central Asia ranks 40th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 463.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.