Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 13.56 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) stood at 13.56 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 6.9% on the previous year and up 164.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) peaked at 16.88 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) 31st out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1985 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1986 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0.0064 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0.0027 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.3% |
| 1989 | 0.008 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1990 | 0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.3% |
| 1991 | 0.1914 current US$ per square kilometre | +5042.9% |
| 1992 | 0.1622 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.3% |
| 1993 | 0.1983 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 1994 | 0.1909 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1995 | 0.1946 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1996 | 0.5992 current US$ per square kilometre | +207.9% |
| 1997 | 0.5434 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 1998 | 0.2492 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.1% |
| 1999 | 0.262 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2000 | 0.6507 current US$ per square kilometre | +148.4% |
| 2001 | 0.7354 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 2002 | 0.4713 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.9% |
| 2003 | 0.5943 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 2004 | 0.7935 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.5% |
| 2005 | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.1% |
| 2006 | 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.5% |
| 2007 | 2.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +111.4% |
| 2008 | 3.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.8% |
| 2009 | 2.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.8% |
| 2010 | 3.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 2011 | 3.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2012 | 4.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 2013 | 5.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.3% |
| 2014 | 5.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2015 | 6.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2016 | 7.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 2017 | 9.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.6% |
| 2018 | 11.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.9% |
| 2019 | 10.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 2020 | 8.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 2021 | 16.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.8% |
| 2022 | 14.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 2023 | 13.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0017 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.008 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.2595 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5992 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4713 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 13.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- 28 Antigua and Barbuda 210.56 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Cape Verde 189.24 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Mauritius 163.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Guatemala 150.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Barbados 139.53 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Burundi 139.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Uganda 139.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
All data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) was 13.56 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 16.88 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 31st out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 164.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.