Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Middle income
Middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 26.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Middle income stood at 26.57 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 9.5% on the previous year and up 94.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Middle income peaked at 26.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Middle income ranks 17th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1985 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1986 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0.0182 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0.028 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.8% |
| 1989 | 0.0679 current US$ per square kilometre | +142.3% |
| 1990 | 0.1888 current US$ per square kilometre | +178.0% |
| 1991 | 0.3393 current US$ per square kilometre | +79.7% |
| 1992 | 0.4592 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.3% |
| 1993 | 0.7069 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.9% |
| 1994 | 0.6539 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 1995 | 0.739 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1996 | 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +120.0% |
| 1997 | 1.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1998 | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 1999 | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2000 | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 2001 | 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 2002 | 2.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.7% |
| 2003 | 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 2004 | 4.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.5% |
| 2005 | 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.9% |
| 2006 | 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.0% |
| 2007 | 6.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.5% |
| 2008 | 6.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2009 | 7.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2010 | 10.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.1% |
| 2011 | 12.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2012 | 13.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2013 | 13.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2014 | 14.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2015 | 15.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2016 | 15.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2017 | 16.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2018 | 18.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2019 | 21.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 2020 | 19.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 2021 | 25.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.5% |
| 2022 | 24.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2023 | 26.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0114 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0679 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.9913 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1888 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 15.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 23.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Middle income
- 14 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 631.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Lebanon 454.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Maldives 442.21 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Saint Kitts and Nevis 399.81 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Fiji 362.6 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Philippines 355.91 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Tonga 351 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 373.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 293.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.42 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 28.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 6.29 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.17 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.38 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 463.14 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 10.26 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Middle income was 26.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 26.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Middle income ranks 17th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 94.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.